The Daily Arsenal

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hoddle is a god
  • Start date Start date
  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
How about CFC does agree with Mourhino's comments?

Where does that get us?
 
How about CFC does agree with Mourhino's comments?

Where does that get us?

Then he will need to answer the question he's been dodging about how Chelsea could have been the best team in the 2nd half despite conceding twice as many as they did in the 1st.

By not answering it, it can only leave one conclusion: that he thinks that Maureen is talking bollocks.
 
Then he will need to answer the question he's been dodging about how Chelsea could have been the best team in the 2nd half despite conceding twice as many as they did in the 1st.

By not answering it, it can only leave one conclusion: that he thinks that Maureen is talking bollocks.

You're missing the point.

Either he does or does not agree with what Mourhino said about one game. Either way, by CFC expressing his view, yes or no, where does it get us?
 
You're missing the point.

Either he does or does not agree with what Mourhino said about one game. Either way, by CFC expressing his view, yes or no, where does it get us?

I don't think so HIAG, to anybody with an ounce of intelligence the point is very clear.

He either agrees with Maureen, in which case he needs to answer the question about how Chelsea could have been the better team in the 2nd half despite conceding twice as many than in the 1st half.

Or he disagrees and thinks Maureen is talking bollocks.

You say it's about his opinion. I agree, so let's hear it.
 
I'll pretend to be CFC and answer your question for you...

"Mourhino was probably acting like a cock, but that's how a genius sometimes acts (look at HIAG, as a classic example of that), but he is the manager of the club that I love, and I am going to support him. The truth is, we played poorly, and I need to see an improvement in our performance in our next outting. We played far better in that awful second half, but it was still below what I am sure the team expects of itself."

There! Will that do?
 
<laugh>

Everybody seems to be answering the questions put to him except CFC.
 
It's because everyone understands and couldn't give a flying fart, mate, whatever CFC's answer might be.
 
You could PM him, then. The rest of us aren't really interested in finding out the answer (because we all understand that CFC was on a massive wind-up).
 
You could PM him, then. The rest of us aren't really interested in finding out the answer (because we all understand that CFC was on a massive wind-up).

He's not on any sort of wind up, he's simply trying to dodge a very straightforward question.
 
You have to say, it's pretty desperate times for CFC when he's relying on HIAG to try and cover for him <laugh>
 
...and spuds shout "up the tots".

bunch of *****s!

If by "spuds," you mean "Spurs supporters," then I have to inform you that I have never, in my entire lifetime of supporting Spurs, and the many games I have been to, ever heard any Spurs supporter shout "up the Tots!"

There's wumming (albeit of an extremely dull and poor nature), and then there's sheer stupidity. You crossed the line with that crack, and you know you did. Admit it.