Off Topic NEW GAME SIGNUP

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Now ACS I am concerned. Why would you try to lynch me when 1. The group have not decided on the tactic for this evening 2. I have been investigated as innocent.

You will be safe.
Tab back to all previous games and I use the scattergun approach. I't probably switch to obi again next.
 
Or maybe SP is singing like a canary.
They were used deep in mines don't you know and mines have shadows and that is where baddies and perverts lurk.
 
Is there not another avenue for revealing investigations as I have been trying in vain to allude to <laugh><laugh><laugh>

The problems with trying to post results in a way that confuses the SK are:

1. If they are not clear to the SK then can we be certain they are clear to everyone else, as hidden meanings can be translated in different ways
2. It can be easier to sow disinformation if it is posted anonymously, and one person could easily deflect attention onto several others
 
The problems with trying to post results in a way that confuses the SK are:

1. If they are not clear to the SK then can we be certain they are clear to everyone else, as hidden meanings can be translated in different ways
2. It can be easier to sow disinformation if it is posted anonymously, and one person could easily deflect attention onto several others

I see the SK has been busy deleting tags though...

Just to clarify for those who didn't see the tags - they included these 2:

Biscan is innocent - thumbs up; PM is the code
 
  • Like
Reactions: InBiscanWeTrust
The problems with trying to post results in a way that confuses the SK are:

1. If they are not clear to the SK then can we be certain they are clear to everyone else, as hidden meanings can be translated in different ways
2. It can be easier to sow disinformation if it is posted anonymously, and one person could easily deflect attention onto several others

I agree, and with your earlier post.

While we have many more townies we may as well reveal our investigation results, it's no use keeping it to yourself and then you get killed.

SK can only kill one person a night, so it's better to get 6 or so investigation results at the same time.

Plus the hiding ability is only 50% effective so not a huge loss if SK knows who is not hiding, it's just a bonus if the SK tries to kill someone and they successfully hide.
 
I think now that Albert has hit the babychams we can forget about the tags being helpful <laugh>

Was just about to post something similar. The problem being that he can play on that "Hey I'm the looney" card - because he ****ing is. Ok then I confirm that I investigated Biscan and he is innocent (unless saved by the doc)

For what its worth my current suspects are Trev and ACS. I'm not sure about offing Trev as he has been declared innocent, I didn't like the lynching though without any reasonable method. The games have always shown a random lynch is the enemy of the good. My current thinking is Trev is the SK and ACS is the mad doctor who protected him. There is no where near enough evidence to back this up and it would help if someone had investigated ACS.

We have a lot of inactives, and a lot of people who can't investigate tonight. I'm not sure I agree with revealing as they now know the pattern for all of us players who have revealed - till the end of the game! However whoever deleted the Biscan tag is guilty - hence my ACS accusation at this stage as we know he was editing tags at that juncture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InBiscanWeTrust
For what its worth my current suspects are Trev and ACS. I'm not sure about offing Trev as he has been declared innocent, I didn't like the lynching though without any reasonable method. The games have always shown a random lynch is the enemy of the good. My current thinking is Trev is the SK and ACS is the mad doctor who protected him. There is no where near enough evidence to back this up and it would help if someone had investigated ACS..

I'm leaning towards thinking Trev is innocent. He usually plays these games quite cannily and it would have been a reckless move to be the only voter. It was also a surprisingly reckless move for the SK to kill last night. I fully expected both bad guys to hide.
 
I'm leaning towards thinking Trev is innocent. He usually plays these games quite cannily and it would have been a reckless move to be the only voter. It was also a surprisingly reckless move for the SK to kill last night. I fully expected both bad guys to hide.

That is another reason I could be bollocks about Trev.

Was it that reckless though? He knew the mad doc would protect him. So they essentially had to just hope that the doc escaped investigation. Given we were talking about splitting the vote and they knew many weren't on, they may just have though the odds were in their favour. It does seem the majority who were on investigated in a complete **** up <laugh> I expect the SK to kill again tonight.

It does make me think perhaps ACS is not the mad doc, or could be the SK. The mad doc may just be a silent player who knows by keeping under the radar, he won't be investigated and therefore free to help the SK kill.

FFS its happening again - I'm obsessed.
 
Players who were investigated Day 1 as innocent:
Sebb - Innocent (Tennisball Day 1).
Rolando - Innocent (IBWT Day 1)
Surprised Pervert - Innocent (Neville Day 1).
IBWT - Innocent (SP Day 1)

Players who have not been investigated:
Nolberto -
Shimmy -
ACS -
Tash -
Tobes -
Less Hope -
Gerrez -
Valley -
Bobby D -
(and myself)

Some very quiet posters in that list who are usually much more chatty...
 
Having read through there's little to go on, as the activity level has been low and a few haven't posted at all.

The only stand out so far is Sebb for his lone decision to lynch last night. The fact that he chose to stick with it even when it was pointed out that it was supposed to be hide / investigate, makes him under suspicion big time.

The fact that Tennis's investigation came back clear means nothing as he could simply have used his deflect. We could choose to investigate again but there's zero point as he'll just deflect again, so therefore he's got to swing imo.

To ensure that he does, we'll need at least 2 probably 3 to vote for the lynch, as we don't want to risk a last minute save by him and AN other.

That would leave the rest to investigate.

Also, those who investigated last night cannot do so again tonight.
 
Players who were investigated Day 1 as innocent:
Sebb - Innocent (Tennisball Day 1).
Rolando - Innocent (IBWT Day 1)
Surprised Pervert - Innocent (Neville Day 1).
IBWT - Innocent (SP Day 1)

Players who have not been investigated:
Nolberto -
Shimmy -
ACS -
Tash -
Tobes -
Less Hope -
Gerrez -
Valley -
Bobby D -
(and myself)

Some very quiet posters in that list who are usually much more chatty...

Seeing as we are revealing investigations, I investigated Nev and he came back innocent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sir Tennisball
****, forgot about this game. Can someone point the start out for me and I'll do some catching up <laugh>
 
Some bitch investigate me please.
If I die tonight folks... Look really closely and these recent posts.... I'll be the victim to expose the bad guys.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.