Off Topic NEW GAME SIGNUP

[InBiscanWeTrust]

Rolando is innocent (unless he's the mad doc and switched votes)

 

[Joelinton's Right Foot]

Surprised Pervert is innocent

Still don't have a lot to go on so hopefully a few more people speak up today. SP was the one who looked suspicious to me yesterday as the one person who was accusing and also at one point seeming to suggest we should say if we were investigating or hiding. However, he came back as innocent. So unless he is the mad doc and switched I'm back to square one.

 

[Sir Tennisball]

Surprised Pervert is innocent

Still don't have a lot to go on so hopefully a few more people speak up today. SP was the one who looked suspicious to me yesterday as the one person who was accusing and also at one point seeming to suggest we should say if we were investigating or hiding. However, he came back as innocent. So unless he is the mad doc and switched I'm back to square one.

I think the 2 bad guys are more likely to hide in this setup than a regular Mafia game, it's going to be very hard to pick up on tells.

That's why I don't think Sebb is guilty, it would put such a target on himself if he was the only one that voted on day 1.

Very ballsy if he is guilty, unless he knew the Doc would protect him so he drew attention to himself hoping to get investigated...
I don't personally believe that he's guilty but it's a possible strategy so throwing it out there. It must be said I'm not an expert when it comes to figuring out if Sebb is guilty or innocent

It would make sense for the 2 bad guys to want someone lynched though as they kill 2 people a night instead of just 1 though, so Sebb you're rather suspicious right now

 

[Rum & Black for 2]

He got lazy and couldn't be arsed. Yeah its started and as per usual the innocents are two down on night one. For some reason Trev decided lynching someone was a good idea despite the agreement to split our votes between investigations and hiding. He didn't change even after Nev informed him either. Just saying...

As for you ACS you are more than capable of being a baddie again. I have already planned my course of action for determining your potential guilt.

I have a question @TheJudeanPeoplesFront
The doctor can switch investigation results, and from the OP he can do it multiple nights in a row.
Can he decide to switch the results on the SK every night? Or does he have to alternate between himself and the SK?

The way I read it the Mad Doc will be protecting either himself or the SK every night, so we could catch one of them in our investigations but not two.

On whether to reveal our results: if you identify one of the 2 bad guys then definitely reveal!
I think we should reveal our results although it will help the bad guys figure out who was hiding, but it's only a 50% chance of success anyway so I think we should focus on catching the bad guys ASAP.

To help clarify when investigations occur I propose we state when the investigation happened, in case someone delays revealing their results.

My result:
Day 1: Tennisball investigates Sebb and he was INNOCENT.

Having read through there's little to go on, as the activity level has been low and a few haven't posted at all.

The only stand out so far is Sebb for his lone decision to lynch last night. The fact that he chose to stick with it even when it was pointed out that it was supposed to be hide / investigate, makes him under suspicion big time.

The fact that Tennis's investigation came back clear means nothing as he could simply have used his deflect. We could choose to investigate again but there's zero point as he'll just deflect again, so therefore he's got to swing imo.

To ensure that he does, we'll need at least 2 probably 3 to vote for the lynch, as we don't want to risk a last minute save by him and AN other.

That would leave the rest to investigate.

Right doing a No Chance on this one.

My vote went in at 8.22pm to lynch MITO.

Between 8.22pm and 9.00pm no one not even No Chance said remove lynch vote. Why would SP say I had been told if not true? No Chance only indicated that split vote was between Investigate and hide at 9.28pm.

My close ally (?) Tennis investigates me and I'm declared Innocent, which I am.

We then have Tobes jumping on the bandwagon saying I chose to stick with the lynch vote even when pointed I was supposed to hide/investigate which if people re-read the timeline in question is simply not true.

Raises suspicions over SP (the investigation against him could have been flipped and Tobes who jumped on the bandwagon.

 

[Rum & Black for 2]

I think the 2 bad guys are more likely to hide in this setup than a regular Mafia game, it's going to be very hard to pick up on tells.

That's why I don't think Sebb is guilty, it would put such a target on himself if he was the only one that voted on day 1.

Very ballsy if he is guilty, unless he knew the Doc would protect him so he drew attention to himself hoping to get investigated...
I don't personally believe that he's guilty but it's a possible strategy so throwing it out there. It must be said I'm not an expert when it comes to figuring out if Sebb is guilty or innocent

It would make sense for the 2 bad guys to want someone lynched though as they kill 2 people a night instead of just 1 though, so Sebb you're rather suspicious right now

I'm screwed now!!!

 

[Sir Tennisball]

Right doing a No Chance on this one.

My vote went in at 8.22pm to lynch MITO.

Between 8.22pm and 9.00pm no one not even No Chance said remove lynch vote. Why would SP say I had if not true? No Chance only indicated that split vote was between Investigate and hide at 9.28pm.

My close ally (?) Tennis investigates me and I'm declared Innocent, which I am.

We then have Tobes jumping on the bandwagon saying I chose to stick with the lynch vote even when pointed I was supposed to hide/investigate which if people re-read the timeline in question is simply not true.

Raises suspicions over SP (the investigation against him could have been flipped and Tobes who jumped on the bandwagon.

Would make sense for some people to investigate Tobes and SP in case this is true. We know one of the bad guys will be seen as guilty if investigated (as long as there is a SK kill that same evening)

 

[Sir Tennisball]

I think the 2 bad guys are more likely to hide in this setup than a regular Mafia game, it's going to be very hard to pick up on tells.

That's why I don't think Sebb is guilty, it would put such a target on himself if he was the only one that voted on day 1.

Very ballsy if he is guilty, unless he knew the Doc would protect him so he drew attention to himself hoping to get investigated...
I don't personally believe that he's guilty but it's a possible strategy so throwing it out there. It must be said I'm not an expert when it comes to figuring out if Sebb is guilty or innocent

It would make sense for the 2 bad guys to want someone lynched though as they kill 2 people a night instead of just 1 though, so Sebb you're rather suspicious right now

 

[Rum & Black for 2]

Would make sense for some people to investigate Tobes and SP in case this is true. We know one of the bad guys will be seen as guilty if investigated (as long as there is a SK kill that same evening)

Also if no SK kill then that may put suspicion on them if they are both protecting themselves.

 

[Tobes]

Right doing a No Chance on this one.

My vote went in at 8.22pm to lynch MITO.

Between 8.22pm and 9.00pm no one not even No Chance said remove lynch vote. Why would SP say I had been told if not true? No Chance only indicated that split vote was between Investigate and hide at 9.28pm.

My close ally (?) Tennis investigates me and I'm declared Innocent, which I am.

We then have Tobes jumping on the bandwagon saying I chose to stick with the lynch vote even when pointed I was supposed to hide/investigate which if people re-read the timeline in question is simply not true.

Raises suspicions over SP (the investigation against him could have been flipped and Tobes who jumped on the bandwagon.

The conversation pre your vote was to avoid the lynch. You were part of that convo and yet still pitched in with MITO from nowhere. No-one joined you and yet you still chose to follow througb with it.

Given the lack of activity so far that's obviously going to put you in the frame ffs. It's also more than plausible that the MD protected you with a deflect hence Tennis's result. The fact that Tennis is backing your version says enough anyway

Pointing the finger at me for pointing the finger at the one dodgy character so far is very predictable as well mate.

Swing....

 

[Rum & Black for 2]

The conversation pre your vote was to avoid the lynch. You were part of that convo and yet still pitched in with MITO from nowhere. No-one joined you and yet you still chose to follow througb with it.

Given the lack of activity so far that's obviously going to put you in the frame ffs. It's also more than plausible that the MD protected you with a deflect hence Tennis's result. The fact that Tennis is backing your version says enough anyway

Pointing the finger at me for pointing the finger at the one dodgy character so far is very predictable as well mate.

Swing....

Interesting.

Go back to 184 and your highlighted comment care to explain where I chose to stick with it even when it was pointed out that it was supposed to be hide / investigate, makes him under suspicion big time.

 

[Warmir Pouchov]

Right doing a No Chance on this one.

My vote went in at 8.22pm to lynch MITO.

Between 8.22pm and 9.00pm no one not even No Chance said remove lynch vote. Why would SP say I had been told if not true? No Chance only indicated that split vote was between Investigate and hide at 9.28pm.

My close ally (?) Tennis investigates me and I'm declared Innocent, which I am.

We then have Tobes jumping on the bandwagon saying I chose to stick with the lynch vote even when pointed I was supposed to hide/investigate which if people re-read the timeline in question is simply not true.

Raises suspicions over SP (the investigation against him could have been flipped and Tobes who jumped on the bandwagon.

Ok fair enough I didn't look at the time of posts, it was 9.41 when Nev pointed out the 2 options thing.

Can innocents please see post 174. We are currently revealing our vulnerability to the SK tonight surely by revealing investigations. What is the actual plan here?

 

[Joelinton's Right Foot]

Lots of accusations flying about but not much definite evidence to go on. We should have plenty of investigations available tonight so people need to use them wisely.

 

[Warmir Pouchov]

Lots of accusations flying about but not much definite evidence to go on. We should have plenty of investigations available tonight so people need to use them wisely.

The tags say you are the SK

We may still have investigations that have not been revealed. I for one would not reveal whether I have investigated or hidden at this stage unless someone can tell me why I should. All I would be telling the SK is whether or not I will be vulnerable tonight given innocents cannot do the same 2 nights running.

 

[Joelinton's Right Foot]

Do we really want to reveal who investigated? At this stage they don't know that do they? If we reveal who investigated, will they not just pick off ones who they know hided thus rendering them certain kills. Or do we sacrifice for the greater good? Just a thought. Perhaps some kind of code would help the innocents.

I think we need to get what knowledge we can out there. We don't want to be lynching any more innocents if possible. We still have numeric advantage and because the SK killed last night we know that a maximum of one investigation is wrong. We are leaving those who don't post investigation results open to the SK, but he cannot be certain if people have investigated and not posted results or if they hid last night. The SK can only kill one per night while we can have multiple investigation results - albeit not knowing which one is incorrect. If we draw the SK into risking another kill then we will also know that tomorrow a maximum of one investigation is incorrect.

Just my take on it...

 

[Albert's Chip Shop]

He got lazy and couldn't be arsed. Yeah its started and as per usual the innocents are two down on night one. For some reason Trev decided lynching someone was a good idea despite the agreement to split our votes between investigations and hiding. He didn't change even after Nev informed him either. Just saying...

As for you ACS you are more than capable of being a baddie again. I have already planned my course of action for determining your potential guilt.

Good deflection tactic.

SURPRISED PERVERT

 

[Joelinton's Right Foot]

The tags say you are the SK

We may still have investigations that have not been revealed. I for one would not reveal whether I have investigated or hidden at this stage unless someone can tell me why I should. All I would be telling the SK is whether or not I will be vulnerable tonight given innocents cannot do the same 2 nights running.

FFS

Ok, who has been tagging? I'm looking at you Albert

 

[Warmir Pouchov]

I think we need to get what knowledge we can out there. We don't want to be lynching any more innocents if possible. We still have numeric advantage and because the SK killed last night we know that a maximum of one investigation is wrong. We are leaving those who don't post investigation results open to the SK, but he cannot be certain if people have investigated and not posted results or if they hid last night. The SK can only kill one per night while we can have multiple investigation results - albeit not knowing which one is incorrect. If we draw the SK into risking another kill then we will also know that tomorrow a maximum of one investigation is incorrect.

Just my take on it...

Is there not another avenue for revealing investigations as I have been trying in vain to allude to

 

[Albert's Chip Shop]

By the way I'm a good guy.
As ever I speak the truth and you will regret it if I leave the game early.

3 15 4 5 15 18 14 15 30

 

[Albert's Chip Shop]

FFS

Ok, who has been tagging? I'm looking at you Albert

Too lazy for me.

Give me 2 mins.

 

[Warmir Pouchov]

Good deflection tactic.

SURPRISED PERVERT

Now ACS I am concerned. Why would you try to lynch me when 1. The group have not decided on the tactic for this evening 2. I have been investigated as innocent.