Off Topic NEW GAME SIGNUP

Rolando is innocent (unless he's the mad doc and switched votes)

 

Surprised Pervert is innocent

Still don't have a lot to go on so hopefully a few more people speak up today. SP was the one who looked suspicious to me yesterday as the one person who was accusing and also at one point seeming to suggest we should say if we were investigating or hiding. However, he came back as innocent. So unless he is the mad doc and switched I'm back to square one.

 

I think the 2 bad guys are more likely to hide in this setup than a regular Mafia game, it's going to be very hard to pick up on tells.

That's why I don't think Sebb is guilty, it would put such a target on himself if he was the only one that voted on day 1.

Very ballsy if he is guilty, unless he knew the Doc would protect him so he drew attention to himself hoping to get investigated...
I don't personally believe that he's guilty but it's a possible strategy so throwing it out there. It must be said I'm not an expert when it comes to figuring out if Sebb is guilty or innocent

It would make sense for the 2 bad guys to want someone lynched though as they kill 2 people a night instead of just 1 though, so Sebb you're rather suspicious right now

 

Right doing a No Chance on this one.

My vote went in at 8.22pm to lynch MITO.

Between 8.22pm and 9.00pm no one not even No Chance said remove lynch vote. Why would SP say I had been told if not true? No Chance only indicated that split vote was between Investigate and hide at 9.28pm.

My close ally (?) Tennis investigates me and I'm declared Innocent, which I am.

We then have Tobes jumping on the bandwagon saying I chose to stick with the lynch vote even when pointed I was supposed to hide/investigate which if people re-read the timeline in question is simply not true.

Raises suspicions over SP (the investigation against him could have been flipped and Tobes who jumped on the bandwagon.

 

I'm screwed now!!!

 

Would make sense for some people to investigate Tobes and SP in case this is true. We know one of the bad guys will be seen as guilty if investigated (as long as there is a SK kill that same evening)

 

Also if no SK kill then that may put suspicion on them if they are both protecting themselves.

 

The conversation pre your vote was to avoid the lynch. You were part of that convo and yet still pitched in with MITO from nowhere. No-one joined you and yet you still chose to follow througb with it.

Given the lack of activity so far that's obviously going to put you in the frame ffs. It's also more than plausible that the MD protected you with a deflect hence Tennis's result. The fact that Tennis is backing your version says enough anyway

Pointing the finger at me for pointing the finger at the one dodgy character so far is very predictable as well mate.

Swing....

 

Interesting.

Go back to 184 and your highlighted comment care to explain where I chose to stick with it even when it was pointed out that it was supposed to be hide / investigate, makes him under suspicion big time.

 

Ok fair enough I didn't look at the time of posts, it was 9.41 when Nev pointed out the 2 options thing.

Can innocents please see post 174. We are currently revealing our vulnerability to the SK tonight surely by revealing investigations. What is the actual plan here?

 

Lots of accusations flying about but not much definite evidence to go on. We should have plenty of investigations available tonight so people need to use them wisely.

 

The tags say you are the SK

We may still have investigations that have not been revealed. I for one would not reveal whether I have investigated or hidden at this stage unless someone can tell me why I should. All I would be telling the SK is whether or not I will be vulnerable tonight given innocents cannot do the same 2 nights running.

 

I think we need to get what knowledge we can out there. We don't want to be lynching any more innocents if possible. We still have numeric advantage and because the SK killed last night we know that a maximum of one investigation is wrong. We are leaving those who don't post investigation results open to the SK, but he cannot be certain if people have investigated and not posted results or if they hid last night. The SK can only kill one per night while we can have multiple investigation results - albeit not knowing which one is incorrect. If we draw the SK into risking another kill then we will also know that tomorrow a maximum of one investigation is incorrect.

Just my take on it...

 

Good deflection tactic.

SURPRISED PERVERT

 

FFS

Ok, who has been tagging? I'm looking at you Albert

 

Is there not another avenue for revealing investigations as I have been trying in vain to allude to

 

By the way I'm a good guy.
As ever I speak the truth and you will regret it if I leave the game early.

3 15 4 5 15 18 14 15 30

 

Too lazy for me.

Give me 2 mins.

 

Now ACS I am concerned. Why would you try to lynch me when 1. The group have not decided on the tactic for this evening 2. I have been investigated as innocent.