You made your point regarding Reed (which was a decent one) and some people disagreed. Then you got into a semantics discussion regarding the word 'credibility', which from an external perspective, looks like nobody was really up for.
Nothing to do with the welcoming/not welcoming nature of this site. Please can we not use that as a 'go-to' thing because somebody has disagreed with a point...?
You've said your piece and I expect a lot of people agreed, but I think the whole thing has bumbled along a little from that.
There were two more posts from me after that. Two.
Do I have to pay a £5 subscription to be allowed any more without criticism?