Off Topic Dark Matter and other Astronomy information.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh no, you're comparing machines to the climate model again ffs.

I give up <laugh>

Later.


You got ****ing mullered <laugh> After your snide comments yesterday when I got sick of that 9\11 cack about me copping out this is especially amusing right now.
[HASHTAG]#meltdown[/HASHTAG]

The actual point of this discussion was understanding data without understanding the science. I used processors as an analogy and solar panels which you ignored and you ignored completely clear explanations why you do not need to know the sceince.

Then from that point you basically just embarrassed yourself.

Constantly telling professionals talking bout their own fields of expertise they are "talking bollocks". <laugh> In this case it was actually me personally this time, had to happen eventually given your hard on <laugh> You do same on economics or anything else if I quote an actual professional, not my opinion like.

How the **** are you managing strip clubs if you are so ****ing intelligent? <laugh> You should have a billion £ empire by now. :bandit:
 
Just re read my last post, I pretend do not look down on your profession btw, I'd say it pretty good work.

Like I could afford look down on anyone <laugh>
 
You got ****ing mullered <laugh> After your snide comments yesterday when I got sick of that 9\11 cack about me copping out this is especially amusing right now.
[HASHTAG]#meltdown[/HASHTAG]

The actual point of this discussion was understanding data without understanding the science. I used processors as an analogy and solar panels which you ignored and you ignored completely clear explanations why you do not need to know the sceince.

Then from that point you basically just embarrassed yourself.

Constantly telling professionals talking bout their own fields of expertise they are "talking bollocks". <laugh> In this case it was actually me personally this time, had to happen eventually given your hard on <laugh> You do same on economics or anything else if I quote an actual professional, not my opinion like.

How the **** are you managing strip clubs if you are so ****ing intelligent? <laugh> You should have a billion £ empire by now. :bandit:

You're that one eyed and self absorbed that you probably actually believe that pile of stenching bullshit.

Not once did I try and tell you about your own profession ffs, all I did was challenge your daft analogy between the behaviour of a ****ing machine and the science behind the climate model. You argued some inane point about processors which completely ignored the simple point was making. Now like a true internet warrior you're proclaiming victory. Brilliant, well done you <applause>

Oh and btw, strip clubs? <laugh> Another example of your gullible, swallow anything, dimwitted personality.
 
Oh and btw, strip clubs? <laugh> Another example of your gullible, swallow anything, dimwitted personality.

I thought that was what you said on another thread. <whistle>

I certainly wouldn't put you managing a fit, personally, you're dishonest, irrational, unreasonable, too agggressive and argumentative and very arrogant and consescending, obtuse, and cannot accept when you are incorrect
Absolutely awful attributes to bring to the job I must admit.
 
I thought that was what you said on another thread. <whistle>

I certainly wouldn't put you managing a fit, personally, you're dishonest, irrational, unreasonable, too agggressive and argumentative and very arrogant and consescending, obtuse, and cannot accept when you are incorrect
Absolutely awful attributes to bring to the job I must admit.

You must log in or register to see images
 
I think I've got a bite <whistle>

I know you are rightly ****ed off when you start posting those<laugh>

Sums up your 'logic' that lad. You post a shed load of abuse, I post a funny gif, but you've got the bite.......

Must dash, interviewing for some new strippers <laugh>
 
Sums up your 'logic' that lad. You post a shed load of abuse, I post a funny gif, but you've got the bite.......

Must dash, interviewing for some new strippers <laugh>

Stop talking about logic tobes please, illlogic maybe but not logic :bandit:

Almost every person I've ever worked with was an ugly ass IT dudes, being surrounded by strippers wouldn't be a bad working environment. <ok>
 
I thought that was what you said on another thread. <whistle>

I certainly wouldn't put you managing a fit, personally, you're dishonest, irrational, unreasonable, too agggressive and argumentative and very arrogant and consescending, obtuse, and cannot accept when you are incorrect
Absolutely awful attributes to bring to the job I must admit.

You keep indicating you're leaving the thread and each time, you respond to his very next post. FFS <doh>
 
I can prove you are full of ****.


When did I say this was a fact? Again you are lying

Get the quote or shut up making up lies, back up your ****, show me the proof I said this was "a fact"

I know you have been busy in your discussion with tobes but I have been waiting for you to prove I am full of ****.

Before you do please remember a couple of things.
1, you are the one who has been caught several times posting stuff that you can't back up. That might OK on a footy thread but on here when you are claiming its all about the science, proof, fraud etc its a bit different.
2, do you really want to make it 'all about me' after all you seem to spend enough squealing about obsession etc whenever I point out flaws in your argument.
3, as you also complain about others shooting the messenger etc it would probably be best if you leave out the ad hominems.

But if you still feel like it, then yes have a go and prove I am full of ****.

Alternatively you can just pretend to put me on ignore again.
 
Last edited:
I know you have been busy in your discussion with tobes but I have been waiting for you to prove I am full of ****.

Before you do please remember a couple of things before you do.
1, you are the one who has been caught several times posting stuff that you can't back up. That might OK on a footy thread but on here when you are claiming its all about the science, proof, fraud etc its a bit different.
2, do you really want to make it 'all about me' after all you seem to spend enough squealing about obsession etc whenever I point out flaws in your argument.
3, as you also complain about others shooting the messenger etc it would probably be best if you leave out the ad hominems.

But if you still feel like it, then yes have a go and prove I am full of ****.

Alternatively you can just pretend to put me on ignore again.


FFS <doh>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.