Toby signs for Spurs - official.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
But if you feel you have a genuine, real chance, to get him for 6.9m - then you're not going to throw another 5-6m down the drain are you? Some of our fans want to see us back in the financial crap.

I get it, but then at the same time, you don't want to be losing out on a world class player at what is still a bargain price because you've been clinging on to something that ultimately isn't going to bear fruit. It's not like we're financially scraping the bottom of the barrel right now either.
 
If we had a real chance to get him for a pre agreed price, he would be here. Atletico obviously feels are they have no obligation to us and that our legal threats are void.
 
It's up to Toby and if he choses Tottenham, there's nothing we can do. Tough it seems to me that we will look a bit stupid if he goes to Tottenham for, let's be real, a bargain price, because we relied on some technicality, instead of paying what they want.
It's a contract between two clubs AM went against it, Saints will not look stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jenthesaint1990
AM are the ones who have messed up not us. You really think we would have leaked about lawyering up if it wasn't true? A agreement was in place and AM went against it. Why would Saints think "ah you know that agreement with AM I bet they go against it and sell Toby to another team that's bid higher" they wouldn't. The only problem is that this is football and AM will probably just get a slap on the wrists for breaking a contract.

Exactly. I think morally (presuming what we've said is correct) we're absolutely correct, but then there's a possible element of cutting noses off to spite faces. I'd rather let AM get away with a fast one, pay 11m and have Toby, than be the upholder of what is good and proper and get and extra million in the bank.
 
Could we not buy him for £11m AND get AM the slap on the wrist they deserve? Go through that long, drawn out process of retrieving the 4 million back from AM through the courts, whilst Toby is our player?
 
Lets all wait and see. If Toby wants away then good luck to him. I'm sure the club have a replacement already identified.
 
Exactly. I think morally (presuming what we've said is correct) we're absolutely correct, but then there's a possible element of cutting noses off to spite faces. I'd rather let AM get away with a fast one, pay 11m and have Toby, than be the upholder of what is good and proper and get and extra million in the bank.
We wouldn't leak it if it wasn't true, that would be a PR nightmare. Saints thought it was a done deal, but AM obviously have been talking to Spurs behind the scenes. Yes we could go here have £11m, but that doesn't matter if everything is agreed with Spurs. I just can't see how people can blame Saints.
 
Would Saints be going down this route if they hadn't received some encouragement from Toby?
Surely someone, presumably RK or Les, will have had recent discussions with him, to confirm he would still be happy to sign for us?
If they have, and he's confirmed he wants Spivs, then I'm guessing we are dicking Spivs around, in retaliation for their dealings with Poch, or going after AM for compo, or both.
 
At this point I can't say wether we will look stupid or no, it depends on how the situation unfolds.
No one is looking stupid. AM just look dodgy is all(but they can't be stupid for getting extra cash).Saints got played and look like missing out on a player due to AM going against a contract.
 
We wouldn't leak it if it wasn't true, that would be a PR nightmare. Saints thought it was a done deal, but AM obviously have been talking to Spurs behind the scenes. Yes we could go here have £11m, but that doesn't matter if everything is agreed with Spurs. I just can't see how people can blame Saints.

Why, it's pretty clear. If Toby signs for Spurs with no negative consequences for them or Atletico, then we were wrong in our understanding of the loan clauses. We don't yet know wheter that's true or not, so we have to wait to find out.
 
No one is looking stupid. AM just look dodgy is all(but they can't be stupid for getting extra cash).Saints got played and look like missing out on a player due to AM going against a contract.

We don't know for sure wether Atletico are going against a contract. Club thinks so, but they might be wrong.
 
Why, it's pretty clear. If Toby signs for Spurs with no negative consequences for them or Atletico, then we were wrong in our understanding of the loan clauses. We don't yet know wheter that's true or not, so we have to wait to find out.
It's football, they will either get a small fine (that no one talks about) or a letter saying don't do it again. Spurs haven't done anything wrong so they will be fine.
 
Yeah, what LTL has said. Atletico seem to be morally in the wrong here but really, that's not something I'm too concerned about. I'm not interested in Southampton taking legal action against Atletico Madrid and maybe winning a payout in a year's time, I'm interested in us signing the player and if we've sat around waiting for the buyout deadline to expire rather than negotiating with AM (which is sharp practice in itself if Atletico made it clear they didn't want to sell for the agreed amount) and then refused to match the Spurs offer then we've missed an opportunity to sign him.
 
We don't know for sure wether Atletico are going against a contract. Club thinks so, but they might be wrong.
I will say again. We wouldn't leak it to the press if we didn't feel we had a strong case. We would end up getting ripped to pieces (PR wise) if we just went "well umm I think they went against it, but that's try it anyways".
 
Yeah, what LTL has said. Atletico seem to be morally in the wrong here but really, that's not something I'm too concerned about. I'm not interested in Southampton taking legal action against Atletico Madrid and maybe winning a payout in a year's time, I'm interested in us signing the player and if we've sat around waiting for the buyout deadline to expire rather than negotiating with AM (which is sharp practice in itself if Atletico made it clear they didn't want to sell for the agreed amount) and then refused to match the Spurs offer then we've missed an opportunity to sign him.
They didn't pay us on time so fault is on them. If a agreement is place why should we go above it? Do you know we haven't? The only thing we know atm is AM look dodgy.
 
My guess is that this will likely get resolved by Toby saying "I'd rather go to Spurs". Probably encouraged by a bit of cash from AM and Spurs. Him wanting to come to Southampton is key for the contract to hold by the sounds of things.
 
They didn't pay us on time so fault is on them. If a agreement is place why should we go above it? Do you know we haven't? The only thing we know atm is AM look dodgy.

Why should we go above the agreed amount? Because if we don't the player will sign for someone else. We clearly haven't come to an agreement with Atletico and the figures being talked about aren't so high we can't afford to match the Spurs offer.
 
Why should we go above the agreed amount? Because if we don't the player will sign for someone else. We clearly haven't come to an agreement with Atletico and the figures being talked about aren't so high we can't afford to match the Spurs offer.
I said how do you know we haven't gone above it as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.