I'm thinking the only reason we've leaked the "legal threat' is we have been given indication the agreement with Spuds is in place.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Chuffed to bits
Found this...video at bottom of Hugh Laurie explaining 'chuffed to bits.'
Yeah, same. My initial reaction was that the talk of legal action was a desperate, last ditch roll of the dice and I'm starting to think I was right.Hmm....I'm disliking this current turn of events now.....
But let's wait for Ron. He's completely incapable of being anything but honest...
That and AM ****ed up.Starting to look like the threat of legal action was a desperate last minute attempt to stop spurs signing him. Not looking good but still no official word as of yet so anything is possible.
How can this be Saints fault?Yeah, same. My initial reaction was that the talk of legal action was a desperate, last ditch roll of the dice and I'm starting to think I was right.
Speculating a bit but, assuming the player would have been happy to join either club, I can't help but feel we may have dicked around a bit too much here and relied on a technicality in the loan agreement instead of just getting a deal done.
How can this be Saints fault?
I think what Puck is saying is we should have said "**** it" and at least matched Spurs bid (that is, if we didn't) rather than trying to wangle a cheaper price through a technicality.
We could have at least added Tom's fiver to the bid too...?
AM are the ones who have messed up not us. You really think we would have leaked about lawyering up if it wasn't true? A agreement was in place and AM went against it. Why would Saints think "ah you know that agreement with AM I bet they go against it and sell Toby to another team that's bid higher" they wouldn't. The only problem is that this is football and AM will probably just get a slap on the wrists for breaking a contract.I think what Puck is saying is we should have said "**** it" and at least matched Spurs bid (that is, if we didn't) rather than trying to wangle a cheaper price through a technicality.
We could have at least added Tom's fiver to the bid too...?