I'll let you guess for any surprising outs: Eg. Henderson Lovren Sakho Markovic Lallana I doubt any of the above will happen, but if a right price was offered.....
Seeing some of the ****e we have leaving certainly won't be boring, especially that big lazy ****ing lump of an Italian that has a rubber toe!
Only one of them I'd to see leave and that is Lovren. The rest make for good players to have around, maybe send Marko out on loan too.
HAS ANYONE ELSE NOTICED THAT FIRMINO'S KNUCKLE TATTOOS MAKE HIM A LOT MORE LIKE DANNY AGGER THAN CAHILL OR MAYBE MORE LIKE CAHILL THAN DANNY AGGER!!? Feel like I'm the only one who's picked up on this
I think Sakho only has 2 years left on his contract and we should be doing all we can tie him to an extension. Wouldn't bat an eye lid if Hendo, Lovren and Lallana leave - however, Hendo and Lallana can at least be good squad options.
Really don't want to see anyone on that list go - perhaps Marko. I have no idea why but I am certain Lovren will turn it around next year. Call a gut feeling, stupidity, lack of knowledge, blind optimism - no idea what, but I am certain he will have a great season next year.
We will see. It seems we are utterly sure Sterling is going for what we want. We've triggered the Firmino move on that basis and this one would then spend the rest of the sterling money. 29 Mil and 12.5 Mil. ... sone add ons in there. 50 Mil in for sterling including add ons and all. That means we might just have one more buy like Bacca in US hopefully
You best hope the club know something, if nothing has been agreed this puts you in a hard position with Sterling. Other clubs will now know you need to get rid or have him sat on the bench for a couple of years, not really the best time to ask for top dollar.
Not worried. City put in two bids already. They can swing in the wind until they cough up. We will then turn up on sevillas door and hand them 20 mil. I would say we are confident city ain't not coming back. I'm confident chelsea mouth is all paper talk as 40mil kind of max talk sounds just the type of city wind up they'd get involved in.
If they have any sense they will go back to their original bid and let Chelsea have him if they want to spend £40m
Obviously this is why i am not in charge of the club but being perfectly honest - i would keep sterling and play him in the reserves. I would not sell to teach all a lesson.