Rosenior and McShane were both offered new contracts in November, the same time as Alex Bruce. At that time they both declined and preferred to wait until the end of the season.I would prefer if both were still at city but they had their chance and knocked it back. No ones fault but their own
Seems City will only entertain a permanent transfer for Hernandez - not willing to loan him out according to the HDM.
Cheers Rosie, a true professional and a rarity these days, in that you actually give a **** and appreciate how fortunate you are to be a pro footballer. Good luck and don't forget your nana.
Rosenior was offered a new deal in December(along with Quinn), but McShane wasn't offered anything and Bruce signed a new deal a year ago, whatever it said in the HDM.
I saw that and I don't understand it at all, the interest we have from all three clubs is for a loan fee with the wages paid in full, if we insist on permanent deals only, we're likely to get a far lower amount than if he goes off and has a good season in Italy.
Can't see the point in letting him out on loan either. I reckon he'll be quality in this league and what's he to sulk about if no one wants to pay for him. It's not like he'll just refuse to play.
Steve Harper - "I've had three offers from India, one I'm considering but I've got a dickie stomach at the best of times".
Brighton have just had a **** season, but finished in the play-off places in the previous two seasons and get crowds of up to 30,000, they're hardly a **** club and it's a great place to live.
Says it all when a player would rather take a step down than play for Bruce. Three of them in fact. And probably more to follow.
If he was as good a player as people are making out why aren't top Championship clubs or Premier League clubs in for him, same as McShane. Club were correct to let them go
