It's not though. This is what I have been saying all along. The investigations were clearly nobbled based on the evidence. We got distracted by the MITO thing cos we were gullible and we were desperate for good news after night one.
I don't know what the score is but we need to apply more logic and strategy and less paranoia.
The people in the frame for Mafia in my book.
We know MITO was genuine so there is 2/3 chance that he is mafia.
We also know that the other mafia member would have wanted to play up the MITO info and keep us voting for him to take out an investigator. Valley survived a night longer than expected but we should be asking why the mafia didn't kill him? Are they out of kills after all?
I'll be honest - you are on my radar now after the way you were so adamant about MITO. I know the evidence pointed at him, but why were you so reluctant to look at the evidence on the other side of the coin that was out there. Most people were 50/50 or 60/40. You insisted you were 100% for MITO's guilt despite the evidence. Not saying you are guilty but it needs an explanation. You played much better than this last time if you are a townie after all. That makes me think maybe you are not town.
[HASHTAG]#justsaying[/HASHTAG]
Vote me then. I'll vote you eh? Lets get this over with

Less hope 

