What I'm getting at is that certain people <cough> Nev <cough> instantly discredit the info I'm getting, while others make open assumptions about the meaning of the clues, that then appear to be quickly deemed truth.
The question is, do they have a motive to influence others in the meaning of the clues, or are they just making (possibly incorrect) assumptions?
As I pointed out BEFORE Tash was killed off for being suspected Cartel, the clue from AFC (if correct) could also be interpreted as Tash being a Townie. I never said he was Cartel.
Ok, so accepting your helpful role, I'm still not convinced it shows anything sinister in who led the charge against Tash. Clearly Bobby was the one leading the way, but I see it as someone who didn't want to see us lose MITO and preferred to have him investigated. Tash was an inactive player who wasn't voting. In hindsight it would have been the right move if MITO hadn't been so suicidal and convinced meth head to kill him.


