Can I just ask a couple of questions, if anyone out there knows the answers:
1) Could the "evicted" tenants afford to stay at Airco if the SMC didn't subsidise?
2) What would Hull City Council do with the KC if Hull City AFC moved elsewhere?
My point is viability. It seems to me that although relations between the various parties are pretty strained, they are actually in a somewhat symbiotic relationship, each helping the other out.
I have no "political" slant on this, it just seems that the SMC is trying to do what is best for its biggest contributor. Obviously this is compounded by the involvement of the Allams, but what would you do if you were in their position?
1) Not sure, you'd have to ask the individual users. I suspect some would be able to find the money, others wouldn't.
2) That's complicated, it would depend on how Hull City AFC left. If the lease stayed with the SMC it would be responsible for maintaining the stadium but without Hull City AFC's rent. If the Council and the SMC agreed to terminate the lease then they would struggle.
Ideally the Allams and Hull City Council would sit down and sort out a mutually beneficial way forward. From the outside it looks quite straightforward, build an indoor pitch, extend the stadium and develop the area around the KC. The result might not be as spectacular as the Etihad be we would end up with something a lot better than we've got now.
Sorry I cannot be clearer.

They might find it funny but they wont give it anymore thought than that. As if ffs.......