Off Topic Clarkson
- Thread starter MrRAWhite
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Even if you don't like them, the special show they did in Vietnam, was funny as ****.
So it's delusion to believe the BBC have simply suspended someone and are carrying out an enquiry?
But it not delusion to believe the BBC are engaged in an orchestrated attempt to string it out for weeks in the hope more people watch?
You don't want to argue because you're just making wild guesses and have nothing to back them up except more guesswork.
Just bumping a discussion from a couple of days ago...
There's always doubt RAW, Indestructible. Don't you think that while the so-called experts argue among each other, the rest of us should wait for the argument to be unequivically settled by science?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ding-scientific-organisation-one-Fellows.html
Believe me when I say there is no doubt whatsoever..This is a subject very close to my heart and it is because of the undeniable evidence that I now back green policies..
The current spate of global warming is massively faster than anything else that has ever happened in the 4 billion years existence and is undoubtedly linked to the mass burning of carbon fuels starting from the industrial revolution..There is absolutely masses of data which proves this, and as I say, the only contradictory evidence has been offered by scientists sponsored by companies who have vested interest, and their evidence carries no weight whatsoever in scientific circles..
Human activity caused global warming is an absolute fact, and there is very little of real substance being done to combat it..
Well we could all sit in the house with our hats & coats on in the winter.
Would save a bit of Sea oh two going into the sky.
Would save a bit of Sea oh two going into the sky.
Must either be a buffoon or as I say is being sponsored to say this by rich companies with a vested interest...The evidence is undisputable and overwhelming..There's a guy at the Royal Society disagrees with you mate
He's a member of the RS RAW, and your very point about sponsorship and vested interests is what he's raising issue with.
You're a smart guy RAW, surely you must agree there's always doubt. Nothing is ever proven.
Scientists have even found fault with Einstein's General Theory. There is always uncertainty. To think otherwise is the domain of the religious zealot.
Hmmm, says he "Wont have his Top Gear contract renewed", I don't see the word 'sacked'.
Effectively, Top Gear is finished now, in it's current format. The BBC shouldn't bother attempting to revive it with different personalities, they will ultimately fail. The Top Gear audience are very loyal to Clarkson and will most likely reject change in this scenario.
I think one of the big channels will be all over this like a rash now.
ITV mate. Not Channel 4's thing. 5 will try snap it up if ITV pass, which I don't see happening.
Mate, Sky will probably create a channel just for it. They'll throw twice as much money at it and 5 times the production.
The BBC have a name and a sad pack of ****s who only care about sucking the cocks of the ethnic minority, I'd put my house on it that one of their new 3 presenters will be a woman and another will be a black/asian male.
It'll be on BBC4 before you know it mate.
Tiff is the only viable candidate, for a motoring show, he's got the personality of a soggy bran flake.
A lot of efforts are being made to combat it, mate, but it isn't easy to deal with. China and India in particular, are expanding their industry on a massive scale. They're big countries with enormous populations needing employment. It adds up to an awful lot of carbon. When westerners go and ask them to consider the damage to the environment they usually say 'Oh no. You had your period of industrial wealth, and we want ours now.'
What the hell can we say to that? Its' a very difficult problem for diplomats to deal with.
His contract ran out at the end of the series so as he will not appear again in this series not renewing his contract means the same thing as sacking him.
Technically it's the same outcome for Clarkson I agree, but they didn't sack him. All they've done is suspended him until his contract expires.
I'm wondering if we're gonna get to see the end of this current series at all.
I hate the programme and presenters with a vengeance as it stands now..Without the tosser Clarkson and his sycophantic cock sucking sidekicks on the show it might just be worth watching..