I said you can spin it anyway. 65 injuries and starting 3 weeks before the season started suggests to have us in 3rd after finishing 7th last season is overachieving. Spending the money we did however, suggests we are not. The reality is we about par right now. No better or worse than we should be.
Whatever it is it happens to be working. As long as it continues to work I dont care. He can play himself in goal of it gets us top 4.
65 injuries.... are you sure mate? Correct, you are on par. You definitely are not overachieving though. There are factors that support how poorly Moyes did just as the amount of injuries you've had support LVG.
Any argument that he's over-achieving is clearly piffle. At best you can say he's where he should be and that's stretching things. This is Manchester United FFS.
But I thought they finished 7th ALL because of Moyes and how **** he was and it was all his fault and not the players who were all awesome!!! Surely with a tactical genius like LvG and £150m spent they should be romping the league no?
But you're not playing as if it's City you will catch. I really don't get how you're content with things under Van Gaal at the moment.
Would those complaining now be happier if we were 10th but playing amazing football? I very much doubt it.
Obviously not but for the transfer values and salaries of that squad it shouldn't be a choice of one or the other.
We spent 150million. That bought us 6 players. How many players have been sold, left or retired? Far more. Do these have no impact or is the money argument another that has no basis in the grandscheme? Oh and it isnt a choice for the club. Results win all day every day over performance. Results pay the bills. Imagine being sacked for poor football. Only Chelsea would do that and remember how that worked out...
And those six have, overall, been a poor use of £150m thus far. It's part of the manager's remit to get the best out of players and he's evidently not doing that. Yes, players have left, but of nowhere near the value or salary of those brought in. You say results win over performance but why can't he do both (he's barely doing either)? All the comparable sides do including Chelsea.
That last bit isn't necessarily true, the results are the be all end all bit. I very much doubt it will but should the football on offer not improve then people stop going. Simple as that. Sounds drastic and it would take a few years to happen but **** football to secure top four won't bring in 75k crowds forever. Right now the end justifies the means as we're third and do need to get back into Europe. Whatever you say though, we are not currently playing top four football and there are a number of teams breathing down our neck.
Not of the value? Monetary or influence? Rio Vidic Evra Giggs While none were great last season, each ate leaders and had a massive influence on the team. So while they were worth very little in monetary values, to lose the 4 most influential players at the club in one window was a massive loss. Also how is he barely doing either? Hes quite obviously getting results. Getting results that many of these so called better sides simply are not getting.
I wondered where Kim Jong Il and Nelson Mandela had gone!! Cannabilism should not be tolerated!! Retro active bans for all of em!
Which better sides aren't getting the results he's getting? Only Evra from that list and arguably Vidic was significant. Ferdinand had been a liability for years and Giggs was decent but nothing special. On the flip side, do you think Van Gaal would be doing considerably better with those four still playing?
