Danny Ings to Liverpool

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should we sign Ings (and should he return on loan to Burnley)

  • Yes (He should go on loan)

    Votes: 2 16.7%
  • Yes (We need him now)

    Votes: 4 33.3%
  • No

    Votes: 6 50.0%

  • Total voters
    12
In a statement, Burnley said: "This kind of deal is prohibited by the Premier League under rule V7 which states that a player cannot be purchased and loaned back between Premier League clubs in the same transfer window."

Chief Executive Lee Hoos added: "This type of move would violate Premier League rule V7 regarding transfers so simply cannot happen. Over the course of the window, the player himself, Sean Dyche and the chairman have made it clear he won't be going anywhere and we consider that the end of the matter."

He's too young for a pre-contract too.
 
£3m is a perfect amount to pay. + a 50k pw contract no doubt. Makes good business sense for a 22 year old prem striker. muhc better than £35 million on Carroll or £25 on berahino ffs
 
Just reading now, didn't know that existed - sure its happened before?
Not between PL clubs. If they were in the FL then it wouldn't be a problem.

You'd have thought some ****er would have checked the rules first like <laugh>
 
Not going anywhere this window - from Burnley

Much like how Ronaldo was never going to be sold to Madrid and Rooney was 'once a ue always a blue' :bandit:

they're hardly going to come and say yes he going etc are they? Say no and play hard to get in order to get more money
 
Not between PL clubs. If they were in the FL then it wouldn't be a problem.

You'd have thought some ****er would have checked the rules first like <laugh>

You know it's a media/rumour thing that's produced this right?

I know we appear mickey mouse at times but I'm sure our guys know the rules!!
 
Not being funny, but wouldn't keeping Ings and improving your survival chances worth a **** ton more than losing him and being relegated for a few lousy mil.
 
Not being funny, but wouldn't keeping Ings and improving your survival chances worth a **** ton more than losing him and being relegated for a few lousy mil.

That's why he was supposed to stay there on loan for the rest of the season.

The choice was get a few million or wait for him to leave on a free.
 
Rule V7 - “A Temporary Transfer to a Club may not take place in the Transfer Window in which the Transferor Club acquired the Player’s registration.”

Isn't the Transferor club Burnley? We would be the Transferee club .... I'm confused
 
Rule V7 - “A Temporary Transfer to a Club may not take place in the Transfer Window in which the Transferor Club acquired the Player’s registration.”

Isn't the Transferor club Burnley? We would be the Transferee club .... I'm confused

I think we would buy him, then be the transferor club for the loan back.

There's nothing wrong with us buying him, it's then us loaning him back again that couldn't happen.
 
Much like how Ronaldo was never going to be sold to Madrid and Rooney was 'once a ue always a blue' :bandit:

they're hardly going to come and say yes he going etc are they? Say no and play hard to get in order to get more money
They won't sell him this window as his potential goals could be worth way more than a couple of £m in the hand now.

Not happening.
 
It's only allowable outside of the English FA not within it then? I think the rules have changed because it has happened in the past.