Rival Watch Thread Watch

  • Thread starter Thread starter Super G Ted'inho
  • Start date Start date
  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

What will Liverpool win in the 2014-15 season...?

  • Premier League

  • Champions League

  • FA Cup

  • League Cup

  • As much as Everton and Spurs!


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why is no one slagging off Eto'o?

Rodgers gives Sterling a planned midseason break, we lose no games without him, he comes back and scores a worldie against Chelsea, but the meda expodes anyway

Meanwhile Eto'o gets weeks off to whore himself out to find a better club while still being paid by struggling Everton who haven't won since 2012 or some ****

Of course no one gives a **** about Everton compared to Liverpool, but not a single mention from the media or fans?
 
It's funny to see player X being brought up to mitigate player Y of their misdemeanors. Somehow even IF United fans accept Cantona in a moment of madness behaved like a violent thug (much like Gerrard btw), I doubt very much any liverpool fans would accept Suarez equally behaved like a racist c**t. That's the real irony and hypocrisy here.

As for Cantona, Gerrard and let's include Zidane also, even though they showed moments of poor judgement, leading to violence these were isolated. Overall they had far more redeeming qualities that allowed ppl to like them. The same can't be said of Suarez.
 
It's funny to see player X being brought up to mitigate player Y of their misdemeanors. Somehow even IF United fans accept Cantona in a moment of madness behaved like a violent thug (much like Gerrard btw), I doubt very much any liverpool fans would accept Suarez equally behaved like a racist c**t. That's the real irony and hypocrisy here.

As for Cantona, Gerrard and let's include Zidane also, even though they showed moments of poor judgement, leading to violence these were isolated. Overall they had far more redeeming qualities that allowed ppl to like them. The same can't be said of Suarez.

Gerrard?

If you're referring to the DJ thing, he got found not guilty in a court of law plus it wasn't football related.
 
Gerrard?

If you're referring to the DJ thing, he got found not guilty in a court of law plus it wasn't football related.

The circumstances he got found not guilty dont change the fact he was violent. On the pitch or not, isnt this all about the person rather than the player? Seems convenient to somehow limit it to a football pitch just bcos it's one of your players that does it. Anyway, even if we put Gerrard to one side, the rest still stands.
 
The circumstances he got found not guilty dont change the fact he was violent. On the pitch or not, isnt this all about the person rather than the player? Seems convenient to somehow limit it to a football pitch just bcos it's one of your players that does it. Anyway, even if we put Gerrard to one side, the rest still stands.

Of course it "changes the fact", do you really think Suarez is the same off the pitch as on it?, Suarez was punished for his actions on the pitch and Gerrard was found not guilty off it, it matters not that you think he was guilty because you weren't there on the night nor where you the judge in court.

Tobes made the point earlier in the thread that Giggs's behaviour off the pitch has no bearing on his day job, the reverse should also apply Treble.
Why do you feel the need to rope Gerrard into what Cantona did?
 
The circumstances he got found not guilty dont change the fact he was violent. On the pitch or not, isnt this all about the person rather than the player? Seems convenient to somehow limit it to a football pitch just bcos it's one of your players that does it. Anyway, even if we put Gerrard to one side, the rest still stands.

Why not throw Robin Van Persie or Wayne Rooney into the equation too then :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Page_Moss_Kopite
Not forgetting Ravel Morrison, Fergie's morals told him to **** the lad off for something that "happened off the pitch", so his morals only apply if the player in question ain't big name.:bandit:

Maybe he was just on his period, like when he got offended on behalf of Fat Sam because of a hand movement by Benitez.
 
Of course it "changes the fact", do you really think Suarez is the same off the pitch as on it?, Suarez was punished for his actions on the pitch and Gerrard was found not guilty off it, it matters not that you think he was guilty because you weren't there on the n

Tobes made the point earlier in the thread that Giggs's behaviour off the pitch has no bearing on his day job, the reverse should also apply Treble.
Why do you feel the need to rope Gerrard into what Cantona did?

Well Suarez was found guilty of racial abuse but none of you scousers seem to care much for the verdict there? I bring Gerrard into it bcos it's a heck of a lot closer to Cantona's conduct than Suarez.You're the one who started off by saying violence such as that by Cantona is common assault (edited). I think it's a fair comparison for all those reasons.

I still see none of you have actually responded to my original point <whistle> Lets be straight, there's no way any of you are going to admit Suarez acted like a racist prick so why bang on about Cantona. You hold no moral high ground on this at all. At least I can accept Cantona's violent idiocy. He received his punishment and rightly so.
 
Last edited:
Well Suarez was found guilty of racial abuse by an FA kangaroo panel that included one self confessed Fergie fan, who coached Evra over 3 meetings and had 3 different amounts of times Suarez supposedly abused him, settling for an arbitrary number of 7 (Evra a man called an untrustworthy witness by the FA previously and also by the French FA. Evra has been proven to be a liar)but none of you scousers seem to care much for the verdict there? I bring Gerrard into it bcos it's a heck of a lot closer to Cantona's conduct than Suarez.You're the one who started off by saying violence such as that by Cantona is common assault (edited). I think it's a fair comparison for all those reasons.

I still see none of you have actually responded to my original point <whistle> Lets be straight, there's no way any of you are going to admit Suarez acted like a racist prick so why bang on about Cantona. You hold no moral high ground on this at all. At least I can accept Cantona's violent idiocy. He received his punishment and rightly so.

Fixed :bandit:

When you just say found guilty it gives a different impression to the reality of what happened.
Personally I find go **** your sister more insulting than any reference to my skin colour.

If it was in school they both would have been punished, which goes to show, the FA have far less common sense than the average school teacher.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: astro
Fixed :bandit:

When you just say found guilty it gives a different impression to the reality of what happened.
Personally I find go **** your sister more insulting than any reference to my skin colour.

If it was in school they both would have been punished, which goes to show, the FA have far less common sense than the average school teacher.

Here we go again. Ok mate <ok>

Whatever your motives for asking Page it's precisely this sort of double standards I'm talking about. If you lot cant even look at your own, dont start pointing fingers at others. This holier than thou stuff doesnt hold much water ;)
 
Well Suarez was found guilty of racial abuse but none of you scousers seem to care much for the verdict there? I bring Gerrard into it bcos it's a heck of a lot closer to Cantona's conduct than Suarez.You're the one who started off by saying violence such as that by Cantona is common assault (edited). I think it's a fair comparison for all those reasons.

I still see none of you have actually responded to my original point <whistle> Lets be straight, there's no way any of you are going to admit Suarez acted like a racist prick so why bang on about Cantona. You hold no moral high ground on this at all. At least I can accept Cantona's violent idiocy. He received his punishment and rightly so.
Yawn. Do we really have to spell out the Suarez verdict all over again?
I actually have no intention of trying, btw, so you keep on repeating your version of it, you might begin to believe it one day.
 
Well Suarez was found guilty of racial abuse but none of you scousers seem to care much for the verdict there? I bring Gerrard into it bcos it's a heck of a lot closer to Cantona's conduct than Suarez.You're the one who started off by saying violence such as that by Cantona is common assault (edited). I think it's a fair comparison for all those reasons.

I still see none of you have actually responded to my original point <whistle> Lets be straight, there's no way any of you are going to admit Suarez acted like a racist prick so why bang on about Cantona. You hold no moral high ground on this at all. At least I can accept Cantona's violent idiocy. He received his punishment and rightly so.
Well Suarez was found guilty of racial abuse but none of you scousers seem to care much for the verdict there? I bring Gerrard into it bcos it's a heck of a lot closer to Cantona's conduct than Suarez.You're the one who started off by saying violence such as that by Cantona is common assault (edited). I think it's a fair comparison for all those reasons.

I still see none of you have actually responded to my original point <whistle> Lets be straight, there's no way any of you are going to admit Suarez acted like a racist prick so why bang on about Cantona. You hold no moral high ground on this at all. At least I can accept Cantona's violent idiocy. He received his punishment and rightly so.


but wouldn't Roy Keane's assault on Man City player (can't think of his name) be a lot closer to Cantona's attack than Gerrards or Suarezs'?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Page_Moss_Kopite
Here we go again. Ok mate <ok>

Whatever your motives Page it's precisely this sort of double standards I'm talking about. If you lot cant even look at your own, dont start pointing fingers at others. This holier than thou stuff doesnt hold much water ;-)
I actually never said Suarez was not guilty <whistle>


you miss the point. You are taking Evra's word as fact and then trying to use it as a fact. If Suarez was punished Evra should have seen 4 or so games himself.

That the FA chose to ignore that Evra became abusive and provoking is another matter, as well as just taking his word for it after previously calling him a liar over the Chelsea race thing. hmmm? smells a bit fishy. Are you also denying there was a Fergie ball licker on the 3 man panel? I am only dealing in the facts here after all.
 
but wouldn't Roy Keane's assault on Man City player (can't think of his name) be a lot closer to Cantona's attack than Gerrards or Suarezs'?

I think they all are Rorschack. I could have picked anyone of a number of players. Not defending anyone.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.