Bardsleys Wage

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
A SUNDERLAND AFC star has been slapped with a six-month driving ban after nipping to the bookies

Wonder what he was having a bet on????????.

31k, would have guess around there anyway. Ridiculous, yes. But thats football these days.

And there is far worse players on a lot more.
 
I got a 6 month ban for totting up about 12 years ago. Won't have been earning more than 20k/annum at the time. I got fined £480 quid alongside the ban.

Bardo earns 30k per week and gets fined £900 quid ... how the ****s that work?!
 
Let's not forget how much the club actually makes from TV and gates. It must be near on 100mil per season. If that was the average wage our wage bill would only be 80 million. that's about 10 Chelsea players for a season. What's the issue here, we all know that footballer are on silly money and have been for the last 10 years. I don't understand the point here.
 
Let's not forget how much the club actually makes from TV and gates. It must be near on 100mil per season. If that was the average wage our wage bill would only be 80 million. that's about 10 Chelsea players for a season. What's the issue here, we all know that footballer are on silly money and have been for the last 10 years. I don't understand the point here.

When you think 31k a week for your player of the season is not bad (although ****ing ridiculous amount in real life) in the concept of modern day footballing.

Gordon on 40k for doing nowt, Ricco the same for being ****e...and so on and on......
 
Let's not forget how much the club actually makes from TV and gates. It must be near on 100mil per season. If that was the average wage our wage bill would only be 80 million. that's about 10 Chelsea players for a season. What's the issue here, we all know that footballer are on silly money and have been for the last 10 years. I don't understand the point here.

We got 65 million last season

13 million from gate and matchday
39 million from TV
8 Million Sponsorship
5 milion Commercial activities

Our wages were 54 million or 84% of our turnover.
 
If I recall correctly Bardo got a new contract towards the the end of last season. 85% on wages for a business that does not manufacture or sell anything is quite good. I am a share holder in a business and the wage bill is 90% of the turnover at the moment, but the value of the business is growing. A football club will aim to grow it's worth, that does not necessarily mean it needs to make a profit.

Most football fans just don't understand how business works. This is why a lot make some very silly comments. The green and gold man u fans are the worst, they win the league have the highest paid player in the epl and they still moan.
 
But when this fair play comes in, it includes transfer fees, thats just the wages, so we can spend 11 million on players without going over it.

Man U have a turnover of 286 million, and wages of 131 million but thats only a 46% of turnover so they have 140 million to burn on transfers before they even get hit with anything. (and that turnover probably has nowt to do with the glaziers)
 
Statto Steve amazes me, think he keeps us all sane.......

We talk of other peoples millions like nowt, and he seems to make sense of it all.

Good job Steve, even if i don't understand half of it...
 
Let's not forget how much the club actually makes from TV and gates. It must be near on 100mil per season. If that was the average wage our wage bill would only be 80 million. that's about 10 Chelsea players for a season. What's the issue here, we all know that footballer are on silly money and have been for the last 10 years. I don't understand the point here.

no we get 40m for tv and about 23-8m in gates so you wont be getting 100m
 
no we get 40m for tv and about 23-8m in gates so you wont be getting 100m

He's right, even though we finished higher AGAIN....they were on tv more, so while we got more from the higher ranking, they got more from tv..........

Statto where are you...think i'm right,,help me out.
 
Well its wrong actually, but remember Accounts for companies run from April 1st to March 31st so they missed out on a lot of TV money by being in the Championship season before last. Next season they will make more than us though, even if its just the turnover from gate receipts, they make about 21 million whilst we make 13 million, they also have 15 million commercial revenue where we have 5 million.
 
Well its wrong actually, but remember Accounts for companies run from April 1st to March 31st so they missed out on a lot of TV money by being in the Championship season before last. Next season they will make more than us though, even if its just the turnover from gate receipts, they make about 21 million whilst we make 13 million, they also have 15 million commercial revenue where we have 5 million.

See folks that's what happens when you think you know.....

Cheers Steve, it was just something i read somewhere.

But facts are facts, and you are a reliable source, so i stand corredted..........