#YesToHullTigers

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
You need to learn how to read then.

I'm saying everyone is entitled to their opinion. So don't just shoot it down aggressively because it isn't the same as yours.

I have my opinion but I won't aggressively push it on others.

This is a football forum and we're discussing a very emotive topic, people are bound to push their opinions, if you don't like that, a football forum is probably not for you.
 
An admirable position to take CMPUNK. A 'neanderthal' standpoint will no doubt ultimately prove to be counter-productive, however well meaning.

But can I ask, what ARE you willing to do to prove that you are, as you state, 'anti-Hull Tigers'?

Be rational and have decorum.
 
Thats the problem with the pro hull tigers! No one hates the man! Far from it, if I could buy the man a drink I'd buy him ten! But there are some things you just don't do and that's change a clubs name and tell it's fans to die!
 
This is a football forum and we're discussing a very emotive topic, people are bound to push their opinions, if you don't like that, a football forum is probably not for you.

I'm a member of many different forums for many different subject matters and have been part of threads that also provoke emotive responses. So I am well aware of the situations on forums.

I have an opinion. I will tell you it. But I won't push it on anyone. And I won't be aggressive to people who don't have the same opinion as me.
 
I'm a member of many different forums for many different subject matters and have been part of threads that also provoke emotive responses. So I am well aware of the situations on forums.

I have an opinion. I will tell you it. But I won't push it on anyone. And I won't be aggressive to people who don't have the same opinion as me.

Apart from calling them neanderthal bigots, obviously.
 
I think you need to learn how to do both.

Skating around the point that you have clearly misinterpreted my original point.

You're basically now saying. I know you are, I said you are so what am I.

No, I'm saying you were rude and aggressive in that and other posts, which makes you a hypocrite. <ok>
 
Thats the problem with the pro hull tigers! No one hates the man! Far from it, if I could buy the man a drink I'd buy him ten! But there are some things you just don't do and that's change a clubs name and tell it's fans to die!

If you're going to buy him a drink, buy him a coke.

He's irrational enough wile sober.
 
Apart from calling them neanderthal bigots, obviously.

I aren't calling everyone who is anti hull tigers a Neanderthal or bigot. I'm saying it about the wums. It's not what they are saying but the way they are saying it. Surely that is a simple concept for a rational person to comprehend. Bit surely sympathising with internet trolls is logical.
 
I aren't calling everyone who is anti hull tigers a Neanderthal or bigot. I'm saying it about the wums. It's not what they are saying but the way they are saying it. Surely that is a simple concept for a rational person to comprehend. Bit surely sympathising with internet trolls is logical.

You claim that you will state your case without being aggressive towards anyone, then call them neanderthal bigots, making a nonsense of that claim.

There are well over 2,000 members on this board, how many of them hate Allam, 10, 20, 30? It's a tiny percentage of posters on here, a number that doesn't warrant the daft claims you're posting.
 
You claim that you will state your case without being aggressive towards anyone, then call them neanderthal bigots, making a nonsense of that claim.

There are well over 2,000 members on this board, how many of them hate Allam, 10, 20, 30? It's a tiny percentage of posters on here, a number that doesn't warrant the daft claims you're posting.

I will accuse you of devils advocacy.

Pointing out an internet troll as a Neanderthal or bigot is hardly hypocrisy.

Now you know full well the calibre of some of the posters on this forum because many of them get shot down from all angles in this forum. So it is kind of bizarre that you are taking a stance on sympathising with people you know full well say things is an antagonistic or offensive way to provoke a reaction.

Being passionate and unmoving in support of your opinion is perfectly fine. But taking personal attacks at people and calling them every word under the sun because they don't have the same opinion as you isn't a constructive argument and surely a person who takes that stand point could be accused of Neanderthal like behaviour.

You point out that there are 10,20,30 of these kind of people. So you are in agreement that they exist. There may be 2000 members on this forum but surely only a small fraction of that are active users. So the, 10, 20, 30 guys become slightly more noticeable.

Now I can understand your response slightly more of I had taken the time to directly male a new thread and address these people but I would say one poet in a 6 page thread is hardly unjust or unwarranted.

Maybe you read my original post in an aggressive voice haha

That my lot for today on this subject.
 
An admirable position to take CMPUNK. A 'neanderthal' standpoint will no doubt ultimately prove to be counter-productive, however well meaning.

But can I ask, what ARE you willing to do to prove that you are, as you state, 'anti-Hull Tigers'?
Same question, CMPUNK.

So what ARE you willing to do to prove you are 'anti Hull Tigers'?

Or will you just do nothing and, if it happens, simply accept it?

I'm genuinely interested, as there may be many people similar to yourself who, perhaps, in usual situations 'don't like to get involved'. (and that's not a criticism by the way).

What's your 'line in the sand'? When WOULD you feel compelled to do something?
 
he should drop the fight for the name, as its doing him or the Club no good

its getting to a point where selling the Club is the only way forward, but today was a massive crash and his words have sadly made things 10 x worse ...

I want him to sell now, its nothing to do with the name, its for the good of the Club we all love

But after the way he came across today, he is not a footballing man, and needs to put his feet up

i feel its gone to far, and he has to sell, and he and the Club can hopefully move on, i think its best all for parties

he is not cut out to be a Football Club owner, I still respect him though


"Tomorrow will go down in Hull City History, its going to be a moment to tell the grandchildren, and at the end, everyone will love and respect the Allam Family"

"negotiations for several weeks have finally been concluded it seems, its looks like this is the final hours of the Allam ownership

Tomorrow marks the begining of a new dawn, and awake this sleeping giant, Hull City is going to be big news for generations...Tomorrow we arrive on the big stage

Tonight..enjoy the Hull City you have known all your life, for tomorrow it will never be the same"

I can see no good come of todays meeting
 
I will accuse you of devils advocacy.

Pointing out an internet troll as a Neanderthal or bigot is hardly hypocrisy.

Now you know full well the calibre of some of the posters on this forum because many of them get shot down from all angles in this forum. So it is kind of bizarre that you are taking a stance on sympathising with people you know full well say things is an antagonistic or offensive way to provoke a reaction.

Being passionate and unmoving in support of your opinion is perfectly fine. But taking personal attacks at people and calling them every word under the sun because they don't have the same opinion as you isn't a constructive argument and surely a person who takes that stand point could be accused of Neanderthal like behaviour.

You point out that there are 10,20,30 of these kind of people. So you are in agreement that they exist. There may be 2000 members on this forum but surely only a small fraction of that are active users. So the, 10, 20, 30 guys become slightly more noticeable.

Now I can understand your response slightly more of I had taken the time to directly male a new thread and address these people but I would say one poet in a 6 page thread is hardly unjust or unwarranted.

Maybe you read my original post in an aggressive voice haha

That my lot for today on this subject.

I'm not sympathising with anyone, I'm just pointing out your hypocrisy and inaccurate claims.
 
When Mr Allam said over and over again he would dump to club if he doesn't get his own way he has kicked EVERYONE in the teeth .

ESPECIALY THOSE WHO PREVIOUSLY SUPPORTED HIM .

AND FOR WHAT ????

A PATHETIC 1 MILLION A YEAR FROM A SHIRT SPONSOR.

So where is his loyalty to his fans ??

Especially to those who have never said a thing against him ?
 
I will accuse you of devils advocacy.

Pointing out an internet troll as a Neanderthal or bigot is hardly hypocrisy.

Now you know full well the calibre of some of the posters on this forum because many of them get shot down from all angles in this forum. So it is kind of bizarre that you are taking a stance on sympathising with people you know full well say things is an antagonistic or offensive way to provoke a reaction.

Being passionate and unmoving in support of your opinion is perfectly fine. But taking personal attacks at people and calling them every word under the sun because they don't have the same opinion as you isn't a constructive argument and surely a person who takes that stand point could be accused of Neanderthal like behaviour.

You point out that there are 10,20,30 of these kind of people. So you are in agreement that they exist. There may be 2000 members on this forum but surely only a small fraction of that are active users. So the, 10, 20, 30 guys become slightly more noticeable.

Now I can understand your response slightly more of I had taken the time to directly male a new thread and address these people but I would say one poet in a 6 page thread is hardly unjust or unwarranted.

Maybe you read my original post in an aggressive voice haha

That my lot for today on this subject.

Rather than hypocrisy I would say calling another poster a Neanderthal is a total inaccuracy considering Neanderthals are extinct.

I'm also intrigued as to what makes you feel qualified to comment on what you believe to be 'Neanderthal behaviour'. Have you met one? Have you studied them?

I'm no expert but if two Neanderthals were having a difference of opinion, they would far more likely start hitting each other over the head than call each other names.
 
Rather than hypocrisy I would say calling another poster a Neanderthal is a total inaccuracy considering Neanderthals are extinct.

I'm also intrigued as to what makes you feel qualified to comment on what you believe to be 'Neanderthal behaviour'. Have you met one? Have you studied them?

I'm no expert but if two Neanderthals were having a difference of opinion, they would far more likely start hitting each other over the head than call each other names.

There appears to be plenty where I live here in Oz. They walk around with caps on back to front and their trousers round their thighs showing the crack of their @rses. They don't work and spend most of their time either in a place called "McDonalds" or a night Club called "The Cargo Lounge" where they listen to "CR@P Music" (apparently sang by likewise Neanderthals) until the early hours of the morning!
 
he should drop the fight for the name, as its doing him or the Club no good

your just a prick maybe around 11 years old grow up

Ignoring the fact your post displays the literacy skills an eleven year old would be ashamed of, I bet you're they type of stupid, idiotic & ******ed **** who agrees with everything the original poster says.