Queens Park Rangers Vs Sunderland Official Sunderland Not606 Match Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
The Funk with the Junk said:
You'd change it to how we should have started? I agree fella.
Click to expand...

Im a big johno fan, but i dont get why we aren't playing it to him on the rw down the touchline. He'd beat hill 9/10 times and can whip a ball him, swear ive seen him more on the LW with connor than the opposite.

Connor is wasted on the LW, he's our number one threat for me.
 
SC SAFC said:
We have nee one else to bring on mate. Half him half his rep , bad tackle 2 minutes in and he is off. Then we double ****ed, lost our BEST player imho and down to 10
Click to expand...

And you expect bridcutt and Larsson to cope with QPR attacking at pace?
Sorry mate, we can't sub our better players just in case something happens.

Roy Keane would never ahve played 90 minutes.
 
MackemsRule said:
And you expect bridcutt and Larsson to cope with QPR attacking at pace?
Sorry mate, we can't sub our better players just in case something happens.

Roy Keane would never ahve played 90 minutes.
Click to expand...

fair enough point, but if keane was having a **** game and on a yellow then fergie would have had him off

Giacc or buckly on to push back the midfield, attack the best form of defense
 
I said last week that Catts is a liability once booked and got shot down saying he isn't like that anymore. I hope im proved wrong but they are going to be on his case the 2nd half and you can see it coming a mile off. Even if he doesnt get sent off he'll be a lot less efective and worried about 50/50 tackles etc...
 
Mackem-Tiz said:
I said last week that Catts is a liability once booked and got shot down saying he isn't like that anymore. I hope im proved wrong but they are going to be on his case the 2nd half and you can see it coming a mile off. Even if he doesnt get sent off he'll be a lot less efective and worried about 50/50 tackles etc...
Click to expand...

I rather leave the lad on, can't ****ing stand bridcock.
 
How the **** was that not a foul?

People going on about Catts the ref has let QPR tackle from behind numerous times and now take someone out in midair.!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back