Scotch Independence - the countdown

No, That's Cameron (great Scottish name) not Fatso baldy Salmond.

 

please log in to view this image

 

This should be quick.

In short, mostly Hun nonsense with the odd bit of attempted bammery.

 

please log in to view this image

The many faces of British nationalism here folks. Apparently it's the good kind of nationalism according to spastics like ER.

 

So we're going for 'descent' now

That's and Irish disease, For this Bear, if they weren't born in Scotland then they're not Scottish.

Dems the fax, Donny

 

Sorry Tarquin, have no time for any nationalism at all.

You are a ****in racist though just like Fatso Fish Man.

 

Everyone in America (apart from the natives) is of 'descent' Bazza.

Christ, your dunger's been battered mair times on this thread than Aldo's wife.

 

Tarquin has to be the biggest thicko on here

 

Is going to vote No to stay part of Britain because he has "no time for any nationalism at all."

Spastic.

 

So who are the Scotchies descended from then numbnuts?

This will be worth waiting for.

 

He's all over the shop ffs

Poor Baz

 

The Irish

 

I'm voting No because I don't trust the SNP. And don't bother giving me your ****e about how it is just a vote for Independence. Every ****er knows that you ****in ignoramus.

So you voting for an Independent Scotchland is not nationalistic? Coming from a pretendy Oirishman it's laughable.

 

Case closed.

 

^^^^

He's an Englishman in Jockland.

 

No skirt wearer.

I am a non national.

Is it not time for your methadone?

 

No need for sectarianism you short fat bastard.

You're spouting idealistic bullshit that has as much chance of happening whether Scotland goes independent or not.

no, but we wouldn't have invaded several countries where we stomped in without NATO or the UN - you don't know that, it's subjective and could have happened depending on the elected government.
The pope is voted in and he has more followers in Scotland than there are Anglicans. Follow that logic and... - That's very well, though completely irrelevant to the point I was making.
Hun nonsense - Really? Protestant nonsense? What's the big appeal of leaving the UK to join an even bigger Federalist EU? Go like Norway or Switzerland and stay out. Nothing to do with religion or football.
No, let's get it to **** like 76% of the population want to - Maybe so, I'm not as immature as that though. I say use it to get a better deal from the rUK.But then I know that the new Jockland has to be built on a solid financial footing.
25% of Europe's tidal power, 10% of Europe's wave power - we already have a target of 50% supplied by renewables. - I'm all for renewable, but it's completely unreliable (just now) and under-developed.
Oh well, might as well consider it never going to happen and stay in this medieval **** up - Don't understand the point you're making TBH.
You must live in a different UK to me - No, you live in Paisley, I live in Glasgow. We have the largest Asian population, the largest Polish, the largest African, the largest Chinese populations in Scotland. The UK has been pro-immigration since the 50's. Have you ever set foot out of Scotland? Have you been to London? No immigrants there...
The most efficient service in the world already in our hands - Depends on who you believe... and at what cost to the taxpayer.
More Hun nonsense - if you don't think invading and enslaving half the world was a good thing, move to Cuba - This has nothing to do with religion or football. Normal people can operate without referencing everything to football rivalry you fat mhutant. The UK was involved in a race with Spain and Portugal, then Holland, then France to acquire land or Empire. If Britain didn't undertake the foreign policy that it did, you propbably wouldn't have been afforded the lifestyle that you enjoy just now, and your ancestors (depending if they were residents here) would not have enjoyed the security that living in a strong country afforded them. The problem of judging history with today's morales is that it just isn't comparable. Imagine going to Mayan Mexico in 1500 and the indeginous folks are throwing children down wells as a sacrifice to the half-snake, half-bird god. The Spics go "WTF" and go about reeducating them, brutally, but that was the time. Britian was not as bad as the Spanish/French but still didn't take much ****e from the indigenous folk, but that was the time. It was 1820, we were miles infront of them as far as tech, education, warfare went, so it would've been logical back then to have a sense of superiority. Back to the point though, it's not something to be ashamed of. You don't go to Italy and find the Roman's apologising for "enslaving" Europe. Go to *****lia and see the *****l's apologising for execuating half the world. Only self-flaggelating ***gots do that. It's no surprise that nearly every British colony has done well after "freedom", USA, Canada, Aus, NZ, HK, Singapore, it has been the export of our laws, education, justice and democracy that has allowed their people to flourish. That's not something to be ashamed about. Pax Britannica is considered by many historians to be the most peaceful time in the Earth history. "Oh the shame".

 

I'm of Scottish, Spanish and Indian descent. If I create the Anti Buddhist league and kill 2000 Buddhists, do you say that an Indian created the ABL?

They weren't Scottish, they may have been on Scottish descent but that's it. They probably had Irish lineage, or German, English... they were American though.

 

Ooooft

 

Which is exactly what I said. You seem to suffering from an intellectual scotoma. You seem to be seeing what you want to see, not what is actually written in front of you.