Hull City Transfer Rumours - Summer 2014

[Jeff Lynnes PBCW™]

All this talk of Deeney or even Wellbeck is premature as far as the Yorkshire Post is reporting...

"but sources in Hull have indicated to The Yorkshire Post that the transfer has happened so quickly this week that the club has, as yet, no ready-made replacement lined up."

 

[SydneyTiger14]

Then why accept the ****ing bid.

 

[Jeff Lynnes PBCW™]

Then why accept the ****ing bid.

Finally Bruce speaks on the matter...

http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/Shan...s-Hull-City/story-22728846-detail/story.html?

 

[Jeff Lynnes PBCW™]

Great to know Dean Hadley will be staying at City!
http://www.thenational.ae/sport/foo...tico-madrid-dean-hadley-staying-at-hull-city?

 

[Mr Hatem]

Finally Bruce speaks on the matter...

http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/Shan...s-Hull-City/story-22728846-detail/story.html?

I suppose that's fair enough. I'm pleased we aren't going to "panic buy".
Either the HDM can't calculate 10% of 12.5 million, or West Brom are due 10% of the profit, which would be the £600000 they mention.

 

[Willson]

I suppose that's fair enough. I'm pleased we aren't going to "panic buy".
Either the HDM can't calculate 10% of 12.5 million, or West Brom are due 10% of the profit, which would be the £600000 they mention.

All sell-on clauses are profit based

 

[John Ex Aberdeen now E.R.]

Great to know Dean Hadley will be staying at City!
http://www.thenational.ae/sport/foo...tico-madrid-dean-hadley-staying-at-hull-city?

.

 

[Tuckin]

All sell-on clauses are profit based

That's just not true.

 

[renegadetiger]

That's just not true.

Er... yes it is.

Think about it.

 

[Tuckin]

Er... yes it is.

Think about it.

Well, yes, they're all related to profit (or indeed loss) on a player in a way, but that's not how I interpreted the previous post. I thought he was suggesting that all sell-on clauses were purely profit-based, which is not true.

 

[merchantman5]

All this talk of Deeney or even Wellbeck is premature as far as the Yorkshire Post is reporting...

"but sources in Hull have indicated to The Yorkshire Post that the transfer has happened so quickly this week that the club has, as yet, no ready-made replacement lined up."

Which is club speak for "We are not getting a replacement but the shareholders have made a nice little profit"

 

[PattyNchips2]

Which is club speak for "We are not getting a replacement but the shareholders have made a nice little profit"

city has shareholders?

 

[originallambrettaman]

city has shareholders?

All companies have shareholders.

 

[DanKelly]

city has shareholders?

Yes, Assem and Ehab

 

[cheshireles]

Yes, Assem and Ehab

Nope! Assem and Ehab are directors and their shareholding is via Allamhouse

 

[ellewoods]

All this talk of Deeney or even Wellbeck is premature as far as the Yorkshire Post is reporting...

"but sources in Hull have indicated to The Yorkshire Post that the transfer has happened so quickly this week that the club has, as yet, no ready-made replacement lined up."

Im just supprised that we accepted a bid for our number 1 striker without a replacement lined up when we were already down a striker with Fryatt leaving.

 

[Steven Toast]

Im just supprised that we accepted a bid for our number 1 striker without a replacement lined up when we were already down a striker with Fryatt leaving.

And Proschwitz...

 

[lewisc29]

Harry Kane has signed a new contract, so it's definitely not him.

 

[ellewoods]

And Proschwitz...

Who?

 

[Willson]

Well, yes, they're all related to profit (or indeed loss) on a player in a way, but that's not how I interpreted the previous post. I thought he was suggesting that all sell-on clauses were purely profit-based, which is not true.

They are based on the profit made on a player not the sale price