Bournemouth AFC Vs Swansea City

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
ValleyGraduate12 said:
What would you call this then Yankee?

"Perhaps ... just perhaps ... Sousa and Laudrup had a better understanding of player preparation than Monk. They didn't have a pre-season injury list like this. Perhaps our un-licensed, I know it all, but have never f**ing won anything, couldn't only cut it in the lower leagues Manager needs to hit the books, learn something and get licensed before he f**s up our player roster."

Hardly supporting him is it?
Click to expand...

Keeping it real. Just calling it like it is.
 
The injuries we currently have are as follows

Donnelly - leg injury during tackle part of game
Flores - back wasnt this a injury in the game
Rangel - dead leg impact injury
emnes - knee cartilage could be anything from impact to overtrain
Amat - hamstring as emnes
Leon - knee as above

So really can we blame all thw injuries at the door of monk not by a long shot.
 
yankee get a life will you and let the football be run by those that knows best. All these semising stories on everything is making you look a fool man. Swansea is a professional club ffs if they dont know what they are doing then im sure as hell you dont..<ok>
 
beppeswan said:
The injuries we currently have are as follows

Donnelly - leg injury during tackle part of game
Flores - back wasnt this a injury in the game
Rangel - dead leg impact injury
emnes - knee cartilage could be anything from impact to overtrain
Amat - hamstring as emnes
Leon - knee as above

So really can we blame all thw injuries at the door of monk not by a long shot.
Click to expand...

I asked for alternative explanations. I appreciate the summary - makes sense to me. Thanks.
 
Tremmel, Rangel (c), Tancock, Richards, Kingsley, King, Lucas, Sheehan, Montero, Dyer, Samuel.
 
Yankee_Jack said:
I'm commenting on what is now. We have a mid-season injury list at the start of August. I'm not knocking, I'm making an observation a blind man could see and asking WTF is going on. Try to give me an explanation instead of stupid nonsense based rumor an innuendo.
Click to expand...

I have posted elsewhere re "innuendo and rumour". It's the staple diet of too many who frequent this forum.
 
I thought the idea of pre season friendlies was to get match practice and blend a team for the opening fixture of the season. In this regard tonight's game is a complete waste of time.
 
Nosugarman said:
I thought the idea of pre season friendlies was to get match practice and blend a team for the opening fixture of the season. In this regard tonight's game is a complete waste of time.
Click to expand...
They have another friendly tomorrow V Reading so I for one fully expected this sort of line up tonight.
 
PaGaNsWaN said:
They have another friendly tomorrow V Reading so I for one fully expected this sort of line up tonight.
Click to expand...

With back to back games you are going to split the squad in some way. This is a good way to test and appraise those that look good in training from those that can do in a match.

How many internationals and Under-X internationals do we have on the field.
 
Of the two Montero looks a tidy player, he did have a good run into the box and flashed a shoot across goal, where he really should have passed. But he's look the best of a very bad bunch of players.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back