Ki Stalling on Villa Move - Do We Still Have a Chance

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Mick Buxton's Allotment

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2011
894
261
63
Chester-le-Street
Swansea City midfielder Ki Sung-Yueng is stalling on a move to Aston Villa, Goal understands.

ASTON VILLA LATEST

Interest is emerging from bigger clubs around Europe, which has drawn the player's eye.

Swansea want Ki to stay but he does not see a future for himself in South Wales and so the club have agreed terms with Villa.

Paul Lambert had been eager to push through a quick deal for the 25-year-old but that hope now looks no longer possible.

Ki impressed hugely while on loan at Sunderland last season and the Black Cats also maintain an interest in a permanent deal, though they would struggle to match the allure of bigger teams.

Any chance?
 
He was playing with an injury, we know he's a bit of a cock but he's very cheep for the quality we'd be getting. Could we not give him benefit of the doubt? It's not like took to social media to slag us off and that was perfectly forgiveable for most fans.
 
Has he being quoted saying that? Would love him here permanently but still sticks in my throat what happened towards the end if the season.

I was thinking that.

The amazing survival that he wasn`t involved in.

Wasn`t there some rumour that his `injury` was to make sure he was fit for the WC?
 
I'd have him back, although if we signed him, Borini and Alonso we'd be looking a bit "samey" as last season. Like a few more new faces to freshen up the MF, meself.
 
he's undoubtedly a very tidy payer, although the fact is our results improved dramatically at the end of last season when he didn't play..
 
he's undoubtedly a very tidy payer, although the fact is our results improved dramatically at the end of last season when he didn't play..

Can we not credit that to Larsson, Colback and Catt's fantastic form though? After all fella, Ki was in the team when the lads league form dramatically improved which coincided with a cup run to the final which Ki was parts of. Plus all 4 of them featured heavily when we were just dreadful.
 
Yeah it must be true, the papers said so.

Just wondering why it's ok to forgive a player who slagged us off publicly, which we know is 100% true, but we can't forgive a bloke who according to the press are split between him not giving a **** or carrying an injury with only the presses word to go on and purely speculative.

The mind boggles it really does.
 
Yeah it must be true, the papers said so.

Just wondering why it's ok to forgive a player who slagged us off publicly, which we know is 100% true, but we can't forgive a bloke who according to the press are split between him not giving a **** or carrying an injury with only the presses word to go on and purely speculative.

The mind boggles it really does.

Hi Funk. I'm pissed mate, so I'd appreciate you clarifying your last point.

From my perspective, I'm not differentiating between Ki and Bardsley, who I think you're referring to.

I just don't rate him. That's all.
 
I'm utterly torn, cheap is good. Some places are reporting 1.5, cool. Some are reporting 6.5, **** off.

Played well and played ****e. The reasons for that I just don't know.
 
I'm utterly torn, cheap is good. Some places are reporting 1.5, cool. Some are reporting 6.5, **** off.

Played well and played ****e. The reasons for that I just don't know.

Cheap ain't always good Disco. My biggest concern with Ki is that he disappeared for 2-3 months at the most crucial time in the clubs history. And that's enough for me to say no. **** no!!!