Hardly.
You posted no link to your random quote either, but just lol'd when I realised that you were quoting 'BBC Salford' as you love calling it.
So now the problem is I didn't post the link
#grasp #deflectHardly.
You posted no link to your random quote either, but just lol'd when I realised that you were quoting 'BBC Salford' as you love calling it.
#grasp #deflectright... IMO the budget was supposed to be 20mil per window. we spent nothing in january therefore there was certainly to my mind 40mil to spend.
the 60million budget was "rumoured" based on CL and no-body club related or "close to" really confirmed so much.
however....
prebite.
moreno 16mil.. trying to work installment fee.
lallana was 20-25mil
can was 10 mil
mr labert was 4.
so call that 55million pre sales.
Therefore if lovern who was mooted was to be ough you'd assume either we've blown more on some guys than we wanted or an agger or skertl sale was factored in.
Markovic, 20mil Orgili 6mil? ... I think tobes is fair in saying we are into spending the suarez money there.
If the range of fees is.. 81 to 95 million SO FAR... you have to think we are going to sell more than just suarez... lucas, agger/skertl... who knows
So now the problem is I didn't post the link#grasp #deflect
Aspas may add a few pennies
As I originally said you donk, it was out of context - a random couple of paragraphs with no link and the text posted made no ****ing sense, given it's Friday tomorrow ffs.
You of all people quoting the beeb and then making out I'm daft for picking it to pieces? ****ing lol.
It certainly looks like you're going to have a big turnover in the squad, there's always a danger of over egging it when you have wholesale change, so Rodgers is going to have his work cut out moulding a whole host of new players into what he wants.
Sometimes less is more.
The one single advantage we've had from having no bleeding cash, is that we've kept a small, close knit squad, and that's had benefits in terms of cohesion and familiarity on the pitch.
It certainly looks like you're going to have a big turnover in the squad, there's always a danger of over egging it when you have wholesale change, so Rodgers is going to have his work cut out moulding a whole host of new players into what he wants.
Sometimes less is more.
The one single advantage we've had from having no bleeding cash, is that we've kept a small, close knit squad, and that's had benefits in terms of cohesion and familiarity on the pitch.
And sometimes you're whistling in the wind Tobes. Having a nuclease of players with experience supported by whoever you can lay your hands on can also demotivate the good players that you do have. At least acknowledge that there's 2 sides to that coin.
Last season it worked well for you. There is no law that says the same level of loanee quality will be around for you this season.
And sometimes you're whistling in the wind Tobes. Having a nuclease of players with experience supported by whoever you can lay your hands on can also demotivate the good players that you do have. At least acknowledge that there's 2 sides to that coin.
Last season it worked well for you. There is no law that says the same level of loanee quality will be around for you this season.


Don't want to start another war on here, but this raises two points:-
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...e-court-of-arbitration-for-sport-9598616.html
1) The very act of appealing to Cas means that the ban is suspended until they hear it?
2) Uruguay and Suarez can appeal to Cas - why can't Liverpool? Are they waiting for him to become a Barca player knowing that they have more , er, influence and clout? (ie, officials from Cas have already selected the Mercs and Lexus's they desire).
Oo-er. Good job we're not a team of phosphodiester bonds!
Sorry, Dave, couldn't resist. It's not a term I thought I'd see on our forum.![]()
My only defence is that I'm getting older and older!!!![]()
Sucks to be you!
I'm not!
You're not Dave or you're not getting older and older?
If I were Dave, I'd be getting older and older. So logic dictates whichever I meant- I'm not Dave.
Everyone else is not dave.
Anti-Pedant note: There may be others that have the same name as he, but they won't be the entity that we know and love and call dave.