you did not answer my question ****ter.
ask him when your next ramming him up the dirtbox.
Scotch Independence - the countdown
- Thread starter stopmeandslapme
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
you did not answer my question ****ter.
ask him when your next ramming him up the dirtbox.
A sum of money paid from our share of the division of UK assets and resources.
Yer welcome.
What? That ER is welcome in an independent Scotland? We welcome all sorts. Even old, bigoted bampots from Nigelshire.
It's a mistake to get rid of Faslane.
Keep it. Keep what it gives to local economy. Then, we either pay our share of it's upkeep, or we say the Nigels can keep it there as long as they pay us for their base on our soil.
All this phoney baloney anti-nuke bullshite for the sake of being anti-nuke makes me ****in laff.
Here's an analogy fur ye:
A bunch of guys each have a gun. Each can't fire first at the risk of one or more of the others firing back. So, one of the guys says this is pointless. We all have weapons we dare not use. Why don't we disarm these weapons? They all agree, in principle, it's a good thing.
What happens next?
The last **** with a gun shoots the others.
Naw, am saying you gay bhoys will be the first up against the wall and not in the way you like it #bullet-to-heid #cleansing
Of course not but I wouldn't rule out the Yanks mistaking Glasgow for Pyong Yang.
Nah just a nosey bastard who can't wait his turn. The only official that gambol has is a wine waiter - well 27 of them actually.
It makes perfect sense to keep Trident at Faslane. The Yanks have bases in countries all over the world and they create lots of jobs. As Gambol says we simply bill the UK (or what's left) for the privilege of keeping them here.
There's nowhere else in Britain that has the infrastructure to base them, so even if we do get a Yes vote they won't be leaving anytime soon, i'd say at least 5 years to locate another suitable base and get it built, to be honest it could take a decade. Them's the facts.
There's nowhere else in Britain that has the infrastructure to base them, so even if we do get a Yes vote they won't be leaving anytime soon, i'd say at least 5 years to locate another suitable base and get it built, to be honest it could take a decade. Them's the facts.
Aye.
Whit you gonny dae aboot it?
*jaikit aff*
*glasses aff*
*watch aff (I don't want it damaged)*
*gets punched in the face while taking the above aff*
This anti-nuke stance for no other reason than "ban the bomb" is decades out of date, economically bankrupt, and politically naive.
This anti-nuke stance for no other reason than "ban the bomb" is decades out of date, economically bankrupt, and politically naive.
Or .
This pro-nuke stance for no other reason than "we need a deterrent" is decades out iof date , economically bankrupt and politically naive .
Not to mention f**king stupid .
