Chelsea v Sunderland

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
marcusblackcat said:
27-28000 in the 00's??? Third best support in the country 99/00 season and 00/01 season. You need to look up your facts before posting rubbish. 2000-2002 we averaged over 46000. Even the season we went down we averaged nearly 40000. That was around the time of your "Johnny come lately" fans
Click to expand...

1997 20.865
1996 17.482
1995 15.344
1994 16.934
1993 17.258
1992 18.390

New stadium, peaking at 46k 2001.

Back in Div 1, down to 27-28k

2003/4 27,120.
2004/5 28,821

In the 80s:

1990 17.987
1989 14.878
1988 17.425
1987 13.601
1986 16.052
1985 18.347
1984 16.180
1983 17.370
1982 19.608
 
London's Only EC Winners said:
In the 80s:
Click to expand...

You can use statistics to prove all kinds of things to be honest .........

Chelsea 1 - 1 Preston North End
20th September 1980
Stamford Bridge, attendance, 13,755

In the 90s:

Chelsea 1 - 2 Sheffield United
31st October 1992
Premier League
Stamford Bridge, attendance, 13,763

Wimbledon 0 - 0 Chelsea
28th December 1992
Premier League
Selhurst Park, attendance, 14,687
 
You sure can:

82,905 Chelsea v Arsenal 12/10/1935 Division 1
77,696 Chelsea v Blackpool 16/10/1948 Division 1
75,952 Chelsea v Arsenal 09/10/1937 Division 1
75,043 Chelsea v Wolves 09/04/1954 Division 1

That is 4 of the all time top 10 league attendances for a team that has no history.
 
CPofL KTBFFH said:
You sure can:

82,905 Chelsea v Arsenal 12/10/1935 Division 1
77,696 Chelsea v Blackpool 16/10/1948 Division 1
75,952 Chelsea v Arsenal 09/10/1937 Division 1
75,043 Chelsea v Wolves 09/04/1954 Division 1

That is 4 of the all time top 10 league attendances for a team that has no history.
Click to expand...

Yes, Sunderland had huge crowds in those days.
I was actually responding to a comment from one of your fellow posters,
"Your crowds were ****e until you moved grounds and got a new wave of Johnny come latelys."

The same applies to both clubs tbh ......... who was it said Chelsea have no history btw?
 
Just watched the game back on MOTD, never a penalty. The useless fat lump actually stands on Azpilicueta's trailing leg and slips. How we also didn't get a penalty for that barge on Ramires 3 foot away from goal is beyond me, absolutely dire.

Ramires is also a scummy little arsehole. Fed up of seeing him produce nasty cynical digs at players. Hope he goes in the summer, had a truly **** season.
 
Drogs said:
Just watched the game back on MOTD, never a penalty. The useless fat lump actually stands on Azpilicueta's trailing leg and slips. How we also didn't get a penalty for that barge on Ramires 3 foot away from goal is beyond me, absolutely dire.

Ramires is also a scummy little arsehole. Fed up of seeing him produce nasty cynical digs at players. Hope he goes in the summer, had a truly **** season.
Click to expand...

It should've been given for the shirt pull so it evened up ...... I agree it was soft tbh.

Ramires should've had a penalty for the barge but we should've been playing 10 men after that.

But, on 70 minutes was the worst bit of cheating in the whole game. Ivanovic threw himself to the ground on the edge of the area, as if he'd been hit with a baseball bat, without any contact from anyone. Then he stands on Borini's toes, shouting at him, while he's preparing to take the penalty.

TBH, if that's what Chelsea have to resort to in order to beat the bottom team you can't really moan that much about penalty decisions.

Doubt that'll stop you though ..... did you notice the shirt pull on MOTD incidentally?
 
Smug in Excelsis said:
It should've been given for the shirt pull so it evened up ...... I agree it was soft tbh.

Ramires should've had a penalty for the barge but we should've been playing 10 men after that.

But, on 70 minutes was the worst bit of cheating in the whole game. Ivanovic threw himself to the ground on the edge of the area, as if he'd been hit with a baseball bat, without any contact from anyone.

TBH, if that's what Chelsea have to resort to in order to beat the bottom team you can't really moan that much about penalty decisions.

Doubt that'll stop you though ..... did you notice the shirt pull on MOTD incidentally?
Click to expand...

Let's say one of your players replicates the 'pull' and you concede a penalty to go down to the championship, would you feel hard done by? I certainly would. You're acting as if he has a grip on his shirt for an extended period of time and fully holding the useless lump back.

WTF are you talking about, I can't moan about penalty decisions? Course I ****ing can, especially when they boot my side straight out of the title race. Dean should be demoted to the pits of the Football League because he is clearly unfit to referee games of this magnitude - and before you start, yes I know you were also affected by his terrible refereeing.
 
Smug in Excelsis said:
Yes, Sunderland had huge crowds in those days.
I was actually responding to a comment from one of your fellow posters,
"Your crowds were ****e until you moved grounds and got a new wave of Johnny come latelys."

The same applies to both clubs tbh ......... who was it said Chelsea have no history btw?
Click to expand...

Not as huge as ours though. I was just responding to "your fans only started supporting you in 2003" which is clearly bollocks because HISTORICALLY we have one of the largest fan bases in the country as I have shown.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back