The Ballot. What a joke!

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I can see why they have put the pass holder information on, as who is to know if anyone is putting multiple votes in for either side. Downside to it, it goes away from being a secret ballot.

I know this may be jumping the gun a little, but who is actually counting the ballot papers? Potentially some could be "Lost" if they don't have the correct answers on couldn't they. My trust of what has happened so far, makes it so i wouldn't be at all surprised one bit if this happened.

It is supposed to be a secret ballot ffs.
 
Pretty sure the ballot wasn't his idea.
Nothing is going to change now it's a matter of pride.

This is spot on. It is important for someone of the Allam's cultural background to be able to save face when they are in a corner. The name change won't happen - the FA won't go against the advice of their own council. Thus having been rejected by the FA, the Allams will not want to be rejected (in their eyes) by the supporters. Since the option most of us want (Yes to Allams but no to name change) is not on the ballot paper I am now struggling with which way to vote. Option 1 is out as I do not want us to be known as Hull Tigers. Option 2 suggests the Allams will walk away IF the majority of pass holders vote "NO" and I don't want that either. Therefore - although I DO CARE - my default position may be option 3. If enough people vote for either 1 or 3 we might just get the result we want without being able to vote for it - The FA ruling that we remain as Hull City AFC and the Allams feeling sufficiently valued by the clubs supporters to continue the (mostly) great job they have done for the club.
 
This is spot on. It is important for someone of the Allam's cultural background to be able to save face when they are in a corner. The name change won't happen - the FA won't go against the advice of their own council. Thus having been rejected by the FA, the Allams will not want to be rejected (in their eyes) by the supporters. Since the option most of us want (Yes to Allams but no to name change) is not on the ballot paper I am now struggling with which way to vote. Option 1 is out as I do not want us to be known as Hull Tigers. Option 2 suggests the Allams will walk away IF the majority of pass holders vote "NO" and I don't want that either. Therefore - although I DO CARE - my default position may be option 3. If enough people vote for either 1 or 3 we might just get the result we want without being able to vote for it - The FA ruling that we remain as Hull City AFC and the Allams feeling sufficiently valued by the clubs supporters to continue the (mostly) great job they have done for the club.
The FA decision is NOT a foregone conclusion, but it is a foregone conclusion that the Allams will use any sign of wavering to try to challenge the FA. Voting 2 does not mean you are voting for the Allams to leave. It just means you are opposed to the name Hull Tigers. Full stop.

It's the Allams who have put you in this difficult position through an unfair process, whatever we think about the other good things they've done - ie appointing Brucey and backing him with cash.
 
Simple if you want to be called HULL CITY and want the Allams to stay then vote Hull City and write at the bottom Plus Allams to stay if you don't want them to stay just vote Hull City but if you really really want the Allams to stay then support Hull Tigers ITS UP TO YOU?
 
Simple if you want to be called HULL CITY and want the Allams to stay then vote Hull City and write at the bottom Plus Allams to stay if you don't want them to stay just vote Hull City but if you really really want the Allams to stay then support Hull Tigers ITS UP TO YOU?

The option of voting for keeping the our current name but supporting to the Allams wasn't an option being offered. Putting comments on the bottom of the ballot, if it's possible, could invalidate your vote unless you know otherwise?
 
at the end of the day, the Allams just need to sell - they have no credibility and are unlikely to get any serious business wanting to damage their name by sponsoring any name change and after all the pathetic statements from Allam, why would anyone think that having their name linked to them could lead to anything positive - Allam is the Gerald Ratner of football - his only legacy will be success based on a maxed out credit card and massive debts that someone with a little more business acumen will have to sort out - taxi please
 
no it was all just a thought having had a few cans of guinness its totally up to everyone how they vote it should be hull city or hull tigers simple but as we all know the allams have put a different feel to it which will have made it difficult for some how much do you want to keep us as Hull City or Do You Mind been Called Hull Tigers its up to you? Think about it would you like it to be Hull City because of our history and that's how you would like to be called for ever or do you think as long as Hull is in the name then you don't mind, I know my feelings on it and i will vote tomorrow but everyone has there own mind what ever don't forget once the game kicks off tomorrow we are as one so get behind the lads because i don't know about anyone else one here but i am sick of this name change thing god no's what Steve bruce is thinking
 
You weak willed, smegma infested dogs willy.

I hope you're ashamed of yourself.

Allam says JUMP!

You are typical of the people who have taken over what used to be a good forum to come out with vile comments about anyone who does not have the same narrow minded view that you have. Unlike you, I can put together a sentance withour reverting to childish comments. I shall continue to Support my local football team as one of the silent majority.
 
You are typical of the people who have taken over what used to be a good forum to come out with vile comments about anyone who does not have the same narrow minded view that you have. Unlike you, I can put together a sentance withour reverting to childish comments. I shall continue to Support my local football team as one of the silent majority.

So is voting to yes to the name change also narrow minded and the I don't care an indication of indifference?
 
You are typical of the people who have taken over what used to be a good forum to come out with vile comments about anyone who does not have the same narrow minded view that you have. Unlike you, I can put together a sentance withour reverting to childish comments. I shall continue to Support my local football team as one of the silent majority.

<laugh>

If irony wore a boxing glove, you'd have two black eyes, Mr. thick Isitinthe thick eaststand thicky.
 
You are typical of the people who have taken over what used to be a good forum to come out with vile comments about anyone who does not have the same narrow minded view that you have. Unlike you, I can put together a sentance withour reverting to childish comments. I shall continue to Support my local football team as one of the silent majority.
And what is your local football team called?
 
The actual joke here is, the Cardiff, Liverpool and Man U fans would all have in the recent past have given their souls for a vote of confidence in their owners in the full knowledge if they weren't wanted, they would go.

We get that and you're still whinging.

This was never ever about a simple name change, anyone claiming otherwise is simply deluded.

So that's what it is? I thought it was more of a jumbled mess.
 
I feel for those that want the name change but don't want them to stay - they've been proper rubber dicked by Mr Allam's poll.