Rival watch

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
"Sian Massey, the female lineswoman seems to get her decisions spot on. "

Women do not suffer from premature (flag) erection problems (that reads like usasoccerguy :) ) .
 
Arsenal have made a signing that will get their fans excited:

You must log in or register to see images


You must log in or register to see images


Dutch international defender Anouk Hoogendijk.
Poor girl. Should've stayed in Amsterdam and taken up a more honest profession... <whistle>
 
O.Spurcat said:
I believe it was Bill Shankly who said "if you're not interfering with play then what the hell are you doing on the pitch".
Click to expand...

I hate that quote, it was always brought up in the old arguments about the offside rule being ridiculous. If the rule was that if you have a teammate in an offside position when you play a pass then it's given as offside regardless of who you were playing the ball towards then it'd be chaos, play would stop every minute and the game would warp into weird offside traps that involve the defence sprinting up to the halfway line midway through an opposition attack.

O.Spurcat said:
"he was left flat-footed"

How many times have I said to you, always look at the keepers' feet. As you say, Hart was left flat-footed because he was distracted by the player, so the goal should not have stood.
Click to expand...

Despite what I said above, I'm glad to see this. I was starting to think I was going mad for being the only one that didn't think it was the worst decision since the dawn of time. I said before that I think it was the wrong call as I think it was an unstoppable shot and I'm not so sure he's distracting Hart before it's already essentially in the back of the net. But it is still a tough call and there was a good case to be made for ruling it out, as you've shown.
 
Nasri's had some good news, as he's only going to be injured for 8 weeks. They thought it would be a lot worse, apparently.
 
Yid Vicious said:
I hate that quote, it was always brought up in the old arguments about the offside rule being ridiculous. If the rule was that if you have a teammate in an offside position when you play a pass then it's given as offside regardless of who you were playing the ball towards then it'd be chaos, play would stop every minute and the game would warp into weird offside traps that involve the defence sprinting up to the halfway line midway through an opposition attack.



Despite what I said above, I'm glad to see this. I was starting to think I was going mad for being the only one that didn't think it was the worst decision since the dawn of time. I said before that I think it was the wrong call as I think it was an unstoppable shot and I'm not so sure he's distracting Hart before it's already essentially in the back of the net. But it is still a tough call and there was a good case to be made for ruling it out, as you've shown.
Click to expand...

You'll hate the source even more then <whistle>
 
deedub93 said:
Turn the TV over then, there is no fun in watching that.
Click to expand...

Way ahead of you! <laugh>

I'd watched it up to that point in the vain hope that Villa could repeat their opening day theatrics.

In fairness they had been growing into the game but Arsenal just shifted up a gear and took them out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back