Today's protest/late entry

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
yawn.. if protesting makes you feel more of a fan. do it.
I will look on whilst you all piss in the wind.
AA owns the club - he hates the council.
nuff said

You both A/ criticize those who oppose the name change; and B/ claim that you're indifferent to AA's plans.

Are you schizophrenic? Or are you bi-polar? Or do you merely like to see your acid diatribes on the page?
 
You both A/ criticize those who oppose the name change; and B/ claim that you're indifferent to AA's plans.

Are you schizophrenic? Or are you bi-polar? Or do you merely like to see your acid diatribes on the page?


no son..
I see it like this:

I support the Allams. They are TRYING to develop the KC and TRYING to develop the land surrounding the stadium. But because the council wont part with them, they are only changing the name to piss off the council, I hope they move our club to Melton and leave the council with a white elephant. <whistle>
 
....:5348659 said:

Not suggesting for a second that would happen. I was just highlighting the bullshit Allam talks.

He's forever saying he pays the bills, and in fact you're always telling us how little we matter to the club financially but it's all bollocks. Season pass income, excluding any merchandise, food, programme sales etc comes to about £8m if you were to say 20,000 at £400 each. The club needs us.
 
yawn.. if protesting makes you feel more of a fan. do it.
I will look on whilst you all piss in the wind.
AA owns the club -
he hates the council.
nuff said

This is only thing I agree with anything you say. The sign at the KC saying "Hull City Council" must Urk Papa Allam every time he sees it, and he must feel it is a business opportunity wasted. Even though I am totally against the name change, this is what is probably what has fuelled it.

http://www.express.co.uk/sport/foot...ress-sport-news+(Daily+Express+::+Sport+Feed)
 
no son..
I see it like this:

I support the Allams. They are TRYING to develop the KC and TRYING to develop the land surrounding the stadium. But because the council wont part with them, they are only changing the name to piss off the council, I hope they move our club to Melton and leave the council with a white elephant. <whistle>

I'm not siding with the council on the whole stadium thing but who in their right mind would just give away a stadium to a local team? Can you imagine the uproar of the best part of 1/4 million people saying that their taxes have paid for it & they are just giving it away? Even as City fans most on here would agree it would be a crazy idea.
Coincidentally how much did it cost to build & what's the current value, I assume with the area around it too?
 
I'm not siding with the council on the whole stadium thing but who in their right mind would just give away a stadium to a local team? Can you imagine the uproar of the best part of 1/4 million people saying that their taxes have paid for it & they are just giving it away? Even as City fans most on here would agree it would be a crazy idea.
Coincidentally how much did it cost to build & what's the current value, I assume with the area around it too?

My understanding is the request wasn't to get the Stadium for free.

The cost of building the complex can be misleading because it includes off site costs to secure the site in the first place. The Stadium arguably devalues the site as it limits what it can be used for. It'll be worth even less if the new investors feel a new stadium's a better option.
 
My understanding is the request wasn't to get the Stadium for free.

The cost of building the complex can be misleading because it includes off site costs to secure the site in the first place. The Stadium arguably devalues the site as it limits what it can be used for. It'll be worth even less if the new investors feel a new stadium's a better option.

Ahh ok, I must have misheard at the time then. New Investors?
 
maybe it would be better to allow Allam the benefit of the doubt Throw support towards his crackpot idea , and i dunno make it clear that
the protest group (if it has any organisation) will support it a season & in the unlikely event that financially it improves the clubs standing then
Grrrreat !! if not - then a quiet return to the AFC is made . no real harm done .

there is no way a bloke in Singapore is gonna spend a months wages on a City shirt coz we drop the AFC and the The .
Ive not been to the far east , but i expect the only shirts on sale are bootleg and of the big six teams in the PL .
I bet its a struggle finding a Stoke or Fulham shirt !

Clearly not Singapore! <whistle>
 
Ahh ok, I must have misheard at the time then. New Investors?

You possibly didn't mishear it, it was more likely the message published in the media was economical with the truth.

Supposedly new Chinese investors on board or imminent. Some are saying it'd shift us to top eight in the club worth league.
 
My understanding is the request wasn't to get the Stadium for free.

The cost of building the complex can be misleading because it includes off site costs to secure the site in the first place. The Stadium arguably devalues the site as it limits what it can be used for. It'll be worth even less if the new investors feel a new stadium's a better option.

What new investors Dutch ?

Edit : Hate it when that happens <doh>
 
You possibly didn't mishear it, it was more likely the message published in the media was economical with the truth.

Supposedly new Chinese investors on board or imminent. Some are saying it'd shift us to top eight in the club worth league.

Can you expand on that Dutch ? It's the first iv'e heard...source perhaps ?