did anyone see the Allam interview tonight?
- Thread starter We are Hull
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Or alternatively he should have made Ehab or Nick Thompson the mouthpiece for this, and remained in the background.
How will it not?
Realistically, how many of us on here can pretend to know more about the business world than Assem?
So you're predicting it won't, he's predicting it will.
So who should we trust?
Agreed. Thereâs no place at HT anymore for those malevolent old ****s who keep harping on about history and **** just 'cos they've been part of the club for decades.
He said he knows nothing about football, He didn't even understand the significance of the AFC element. How is that going to attract revenue...unless it's not about revenue abroad....
No this is the man who said he would like to see 40,000 stadium and £10 a go admission.
Carry on as Hull City AFC. aka The Tigers. If a sponsor's interested in the Tiger brand, we've still got one.
Asian betting company onboard already .. approx. £10 mill ... Im sure you protesters can afford that and the £11mill deficit ? ... football is business ... not fans .. you mean nothing as I have told you for the last month ... I hope more of you wake up ... I really do
Tizer is shorter than Coca Cola, so is IRN BRU. So is Pepsi.
Coca Cola did not achieve their dominance through the name but by a whole host of measures, most noticeably in this country by giving small outlets lovely cool display cabinets on the proviso that rivals drinks are not sold.
Nowt to do with marketing or snappy titles- all to do with bullying and shelfspace, economic muscle and hostile targeting of rivals.
Coca Cola did not achieve their dominance through the name but by a whole host of measures, most noticeably in this country by giving small outlets lovely cool display cabinets on the proviso that rivals drinks are not sold.
Nowt to do with marketing or snappy titles- all to do with bullying and shelfspace, economic muscle and hostile targeting of rivals.
No...your argument against the re-brand, is that is will NOT generate additional income. So if you're right, where is the additional £11M coming from?
you got told in the interview .. you as a person are nothing .. and if your on about the betting company .. its SBObet ... go research it
"It's alright getting promoted at a cost of £66M to me, haven't got more money to spend."
No worries then?
No worries then?
You have missed out a major part of this quote.
That was the requirement to expand the capacity, 2nd tier on the East Stand for starters.
Who will pay for this?
If you had a rented property would you put an extension on it, etc
They have invested quite extensively on a rented property, quoted at 3m, that they won't get back from the landlords.
It doesn't need to generate additional income over that already predicted. The rebrand at this stage will cost money, not generate it. Income from a rebrand would be future income. If the shortfall wasn't budgeted for, now's the wrong time totally for a rebrand.
Sbobet's **** all to do with the rebrand, They've bought a few concessions this season.
LIKE I SAID........... he has to be scrupulous and run everything business like!
none of this emotive ****!
he doesnt have to know anything about the football side!
that is why he employed SB.
as long as he has control of the purse strings I feel that we can be a success.
none of this emotive ****!
he doesnt have to know anything about the football side!
that is why he employed SB.
as long as he has control of the purse strings I feel that we can be a success.