You are correct of course. I'm still havin the most trouble with the concepts of "I don't rate African players" " Gary hooper is a target man" and the vendetta you have against Robert snodgrass, one of our most outstanding players.
Well, the quote was that I don't generally rate African players, so you are again incorrect. I don't generally like African players because they are very much face forward and run and little else. If you watch the African Nations they all do it (apart from the Nothern sides). Run forward give the ball away, run back, get the ball, run forward etc etc.
Gary Hooper was burly (which I would still describe him as given the pictures I've seen of him, he looks very barrel chested to me) and the theory was Hughton would use him as a target man (which we still don't know yet). I'll wait and see how the ball is given to him this season first before I say I'm wrong. It's all down to the crosses.
I have never stated anything to say I have a vendetta against Snodgrass, I just said if we had a big bid for him I'd probably accept it and that given how Hughton may be setting the team up for speed he may find himself on the bench at Christmas.
And I'll reiterate before what I said about not lower league players but League One players, I can't remember if the term was chimps or monkeys. I'd still advocate that idea that it is not the correct place to be looking for players,
you don't see too many on here requesting we look down there now. NOOOOOO, all to busy lusting after the Europeans which I advocated at the time. Lets look at the players I moaned about Elliott Bennett,IMO peripheral and barely contributes (despite the rave reviews of what he COULD do with the ball). Morison (he was not one of the L1) already kicked out for frankly not being able to do anything. Pilkington, I would have to admit he's good enough for us, good goalscorer, a bit headless and cannot pass however.
Those were the three I stuck my neck out and said would not contribute and I'd say I was half right. Everyone else seem to think they were all great at the time so they were half right as well. Only difference is, they say that about everyone we sign.