2013 Confederations Cup

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Looking at it again a yellow card was fine. The ball was going away from goal and therefore not denying a clear goal scoring opportunity.

Depends. If the referee thinks the touch on the ball was the striker it's a yellow. If he thinks Buffon took the man and then the ball it's a red.
 
Why? Regardless there was no clear goal scoring opportunity.

Because he's completely through and it's just a one on one (which is a clear goal scoring opportunity) if Buffon's fouled him and then taken the ball away. If the striker has nicked the ball away to the defender it's a yellow as he's stopped it being a goal scoring opportunity by his own doing.
 
Because he's completely through and it's just a one on one (which is a clear goal scoring opportunity) if Buffon's fouled him and then taken the ball away. If the striker has nicked the ball away to the defender it's a yellow as he's stopped it being a goal scoring opportunity by his own doing.

But the striker had no control of the ball - it was an underhit backpass that he chased down. The ball was behind him when he was taken down. Even if he had nicked the ball away from the keeper it would have probably gone away from the goal.
 
But the striker had no control of the ball - it was an underhit backpass that he chased down. The ball was behind him when he was taken down. Even if he had nicked the ball away from the keeper it would have probably gone away from the goal.

He's obviously interpreted(imagined) it as the striker nicking the ball away from the goalkeeper towards the defender so it doesn't matter. Imagine if a striker was running onto an under hit back pass and a defender went through the striker and then got the ball to prevent a one on one with the keeper. It would be a red. Even more so if it's the actual keeper.
 
He's obviously interpreted(imagined) it as the striker nicking the ball away from the goalkeeper towards the defender so it doesn't matter. Imagine if a striker was running onto an under hit back pass and a defender went through the striker and then got the ball to prevent a one on one with the keeper. It would be a red. Even more so if it's the actual keeper.

For a red card to be given for denying a clear goalscoring opportunity, the attacker must have been able to reach the ball and have a clear chance to score. Not so in this case.