On watching more than 80% of all of his career games
Fair enough. I wasn't aware of that. As DTLW says though, let's make judgements based on his performances ins Saints shirt.
On watching more than 80% of all of his career games
I think we made a terrible signing.
That being said, I sincerly hope he will be a massive success.
No there have been only 2 signings which I can think of that have disappointed me since the Liebherrs took over. This one and Fox, although Fox was more due to the fact that I thought we didn't particularly need a LB at the time.
Like others have said there must be a reason why he was linked to some of the biggest clubs about, so I'm hoping what I've seen of him isn't a true reflection of his ability and was more a confidence issue.
Because we would have done just as well with Harding as our 1st LB.
We spent 12m on Ramirez, Around 4-5m each on Mayuka, Forren. We spent 6m on Rodriguez who is the only real silver lining on our big spending deals and that's based more on perceived potential rather than end product.My question is this though: is it really that nabs? Would a club like us spend 8.5m on someone who is going to potentially be a terrible signing?
We spent 12m on Ramirez, Around 4-5m each on Mayuka, Forren. We spent 6m on Rodriguez who is the only real silver lining on our big spending deals and that's based more on perceived potential rather than end product.
we also spent big on Danny Fox in the championship.
Since Pardew I don't think our spending habits have covered us with glory tbh. Clyne, Cork and Sharp have pretty much been the only unqualified successes at the respective levels we signed them.
Ramirez was a good value signing, even if it's just for the fact that we will easily be able to sell him for more than we bought him for.
Independent Financial AdvisorWhat?
quoting myself to keep the thread of the conversation going.n.b. while he made a contribution in terms of goals scored, every year he contributes little, he's (a) keeping someone out of the team/squad and (b) costing us between 4 and 5 million pounds before NHI contributions.
if we were to consider his contribution this season substandard, we need to get £16m for him before we're really on a profit. Next season £20m
We spent 12m on Ramirez, Around 4-5m each on Mayuka, Forren. We spent 6m on Rodriguez who is the only real silver lining on our big spending deals and that's based more on perceived potential rather than end product.
we also spent big on Danny Fox in the championship.
Since Pardew I don't think our spending habits have covered us with glory tbh. Clyne, Cork and Sharp have pretty much been the only unqualified successes at the respective levels we signed them.
Ramirez has got the talent to do it. I'm not sure he's got the mentality to do it. The hissy fit at Bologna over the move and transparency over his motivation to join us give me no comfort.Obviously the jury is still out on Forren (let's judge him when we've seen him in action), but I've have seen enough of Ramirez to know that he will be a huge asset to us, Maya has been a success after a dodgy start admittedly. As for Danny Fox, well he played enough of a part in our promotion (with assists) to have been worth the 2m we paid for him, obviously he is just back up now.
We're actually enormously fortunate to have stayed up given nearly all our signings turned out to be not ready yet.
Davis, Clyne, and Boruc was it.
Oh yeah and Maya eventually.