I havn't posted much on here lately, but I have been reading on and off - and i've noticed accross boards a number of differing opinions as to whether:
The Prem is stronger now than a few years ago
& whether other leagues are better
Arguements for and against seem to be based on viewing figures, sponsership, top players coming/leaving and European performance.
I just wanted to throw in my 2cents and see what people thought in a dedicated article, so please indulge me:
To my mind the viewing figures only relate to the popularity of the league. This is not an indication of the Leagues strength in terms of Squad quality - however obviously over time more viewers = more money
In terms of the gap from Top to Bottom - I believe the bottom clubs are closer to being "TOP 4" than ever before (RVP utd excluded). I believe this means the league is more competitive than it has been in the time i've been watching (95ish onwards). I deffinitely believe that Utd, Chelsea and City have some of the best squads in Europe, whilst 4th is up for grabs from Spurs, Arsenal and Liverpool.
A few years ago all four top 4 teams were in with a shout of winning the champions league so you can certainly say that the league is weaker from that point of view. However, i've never really seen any teams look capable of winning the Europa leage as it has often been filled by the likes of Stoke, Bolton, Villa, West ham (besides us) wheras this year Spurs, Newcastle, Chelsea and untill last round Liverpool were all very possible contenders.
Added to that Swansea for next year who play fantastic football, ideal for Europe and Liverpool + one of SPurs/Arsenal and Chelsea again and I think the Europa league representation is stronger than ever.
So in all, whilst the league is not as strong at the top end, the middle end teams are making much of a fight for things.
Do you think this makes it stronger or weaker? have I missed out anything important?
The Prem is stronger now than a few years ago
& whether other leagues are better
Arguements for and against seem to be based on viewing figures, sponsership, top players coming/leaving and European performance.
I just wanted to throw in my 2cents and see what people thought in a dedicated article, so please indulge me:
To my mind the viewing figures only relate to the popularity of the league. This is not an indication of the Leagues strength in terms of Squad quality - however obviously over time more viewers = more money
In terms of the gap from Top to Bottom - I believe the bottom clubs are closer to being "TOP 4" than ever before (RVP utd excluded). I believe this means the league is more competitive than it has been in the time i've been watching (95ish onwards). I deffinitely believe that Utd, Chelsea and City have some of the best squads in Europe, whilst 4th is up for grabs from Spurs, Arsenal and Liverpool.
A few years ago all four top 4 teams were in with a shout of winning the champions league so you can certainly say that the league is weaker from that point of view. However, i've never really seen any teams look capable of winning the Europa leage as it has often been filled by the likes of Stoke, Bolton, Villa, West ham (besides us) wheras this year Spurs, Newcastle, Chelsea and untill last round Liverpool were all very possible contenders.
Added to that Swansea for next year who play fantastic football, ideal for Europe and Liverpool + one of SPurs/Arsenal and Chelsea again and I think the Europa league representation is stronger than ever.
So in all, whilst the league is not as strong at the top end, the middle end teams are making much of a fight for things.
Do you think this makes it stronger or weaker? have I missed out anything important?


