January Transfer Rumors

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Bandit said:
Do you have to take everything so literal? Frustration at the situation, not at the club (well, not Fulham)

Thought you were leaving the forum for a while anyway?
Click to expand...

Alright sweetheart, you should take your own advice! Given your usual whinges I took it as I read it, and responded with a dab of humour. Apologies.

I just gave the threads I knew would piss me off a wide berth, I'm going nowhere.
 
More from Sky Sports (following on from what C58 posted)...

We are hearing Fulham are considering a move for Lyon striker Bafetimbi Gomis as they look to bolster their attacking options before the 11pm deadline.
Click to expand...

Isn't he one of the strikers we tried signing last summer?
 
Bandit said:
Steklenberg prevented from boarding plane due to Roma being unable to find a replacement. No Butland and no Steklenberg. Well done.
Click to expand...
Stekelenburg has been completed and totally stitched up by Roma. I can't see why he'd want to play for them after they elected to humiliate him by stranding him in mid-air. Surely the situation now doesn't make sense for anyone?

Bandit said:
This is Gignac all over again. Clubs should be prevented from being able to pull the plug at the last moment.
Click to expand...
I also don't understand why UEFA allow a 6pm deadline in Italy but 12am in the UK? At the least it should be 12am everywhere (meaning that Italy would close their window at 11pm GMT).
 
Surlyc said:
Stekelenburg has been completed and totally stitched up by Roma. I can't see why he'd want to play for them after they elected to humiliate him by stranding him in mid-air. Surely the situation now doesn't make sense for anyone?
Click to expand...

As has been said, he's their second-choice keeper so even if he's now third choice, he'll only be there for emergencies. And if he refuses to play then he'll only do himself in. I agree with you though, Roma appear to have come off worse.

fulham traveller said:
we can get him in the summer
Click to expand...

Let's hope so! He'd be an ideal signing.
 
Bidley said:
As has been said, he's their second-choice keeper so even if he's now third choice, he'll only be there for emergencies. And if he refuses to play then he'll only do himself in. I agree with you though, Roma appear to have come off worse.
Click to expand...
True, but why keep an uphappy player as a backup? At the least with Fulham he'd put himself in the shop window, so they can recoup a bit more of that £8m outlay.
 
Surlyc said:
True, but why keep an uphappy player as a backup? At the least with Fulham he'd put himself in the shop window, so they can recoup a bit more of that £8m outlay.
Click to expand...

You'd think so wouldn't you! It'll be interesting to see what gets said in the press over the next couple of days.
 
Haha, I saw that and wondered if there was any truth in it, he's not exactly a big name (is he?). Having said that, would he recognise Tomas Rincon? :D
 
Having said that, I would rather have Rincon than Manolev. Both are midfielder/right backs, but Rincon seems more stable than Manolev!
 
Surlyc said:
Having said that, I would rather have Rincon than Manolev. Both are midfielder/right backs, but Rincon seems more stable than Manolev!
Click to expand...

Haha, Barry Manolev (which I would be calling him if he joins) doesn't exactly have a ringing endorsement does he! I'd rather Rincon too. He's younger as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back