Right, so you haven't read the points i made, but choose to criticise anyway?
Goodbye
- Thread starter Proud Tiger
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Right, so you haven't read the points i made, but choose to criticise anyway?
Saw the Stones at Granby Halls in 1976. Just up the road from the prison. Met my future wife the following night at a party.
Right, so you haven't read the points i made, but choose to criticise anyway?
The basis of your argument was that your club has progressed over the last 10 years and you argue that fact? No?
If 10 years ago your fans were decent people who could have a decent conversation then yes, i'd agree that you've gone in the opposite direction.
Now, listen, fook off.
Right, so you haven't read the points i made, but choose to criticise anyway?
The basis of your argument was that your club has progressed over the last 10 years and you argue that fact? No?
If 10 years ago your fans were decent people who could have a decent conversation then yes, i'd agree that you've gone in the opposite direction.
Now, listen, fook off.
I guess in Leicester, £50million debt and moments away from liquidation and having no real assets is off the pitch progress.
I guess in Leicester, £50million debt and moments away from liquidation and having no real assets is off the pitch progress.
'Moments away from liquidation'
In ye ****ing dreams.Brilliant.
Well, chum, a decade ago we were in administration, so yeah, we've improved
and i'd say that the stadium and the top quality training ground is more than enough assets. Not to mention the first team squad.
'Moments away from liquidation'
Brilliant.
Well, chum, a decade ago we were in administration, so yeah, we've improved
and i'd say that the stadium and the top quality training ground is more than enough assets. Not to mention the first team squad.
Eh? up to Mr Allam stepping in, we were looking at the very real probability of liquidation. That was the only option open and the 'moments away' is from the then chairman. The stadium isn't ours and the training ground was due to be upgraded as it's not 'top quality' but a lack of funds has prevented it. We've the second smallest squad in this league.
Still, I guess that's progress eh.
I'd say this is around 6 pages arguing about Hulls history, and... Well, I don't really know what we're arguing anymore.
All I know is, I couldn't care less and this is boring...
All I know is, I couldn't care less and this is boring...
I couldn't agree more. I find it bizarre that despite several Hull City fans pointing out the same things, Proud and Akcj still think they know more about Hull than us, yet get hissy and accuse ME of being the argumentative one.
Eh? up to Mr Allam stepping in, we were looking at the very real probability of liquidation. That was the only option open and the 'moments away' is from the then chairman. The stadium isn't ours and the training ground was due to be upgraded as it's not 'top quality' but a lack of funds has prevented it. We've the second smallest squad in this league.
Still, I guess that's progress eh.
You've gone from a ****e club with a ****e squad possibly worth about 50k in total to a team where you, so you say, you could flog players for millions.
You talk out ye ****ing arse.
Well, when you put such a structured and coherent case forward...
No reply again? Shame. Off you pop boy, school in the morning.
No replay again? Shame. Off you pop boy, school in the morning.
I assume you mean reply, as in the one you quoted?
As someone else pointed out, it was boring the first time round, and you and t'other tosspot have shown you tend to ignore what little you bother to read, so it seems pointless repeating what's already there when you can ignore the truth just as easily from the earlier replies.
I assume you mean reply, as in the one you quoted?
As someone else pointed out, it was boring the first time round, and you and t'other tosspot have shown you tend to ignore what little you bother to read, so it seems pointless repeating what's already there when you can ignore the truth just as easily from the earlier replies.
Whatever kiddo, bored playing with you now.
You ignore the real stats, you act as though an improvement in the bogs is a better improvement than a jump of 2 leagues.
This'll be the the last time I compliment Hull.
****ing bunch of ****s 
We all thought that new guy (18 and legal, or whatever he's called) was Charlie in disguise. But it turns out he's not. And Charlie is still here anyway.
Gangster or whatever you're called, u got it wrong. You all assumedi was Charlie (whoever he is). Proud checked it out (ta).
My head is spinning with all this he said/she said stuff. I might be back again for more fun and jokularity (is that a word) but there is no way I could do what u lot do on a daily basis. Fair play to u though for supporting your club. I think once it descends to name calling all reasoning has gone.
I am far from being a prude (its prob an age thing). Also, I got brought up being told 'you will never win an argument' mainly cause the other person thinks they're right.
Good night Leicester chaps and chapesses.
No offense, I couldn't be bother to search for you're actual username.
You might want to read my post again though, I said we thought you were Charlie but then it was established that you aren't. I actually didn't personally accuse you of being him, because Proud confirmed you both have different IP addresses before I even arrived.Agreed about the silliness, it's clear one or two posters are just looking for an argument (reminds me of the old Monty Python sketch) but we always welcome decent posters, so feel free to come back.