"Expecting" your team to do well when there is absolutely no objective basis for holding such an expectation, that is delusion. That is what you Mousers suffer from.

You really are scraping the barrel now.
"Expecting" your team to do well when there is absolutely no objective basis for holding such an expectation, that is delusion. That is what you Mousers suffer from.

It's also brought you long streaks of utter irrelevance, which seems lost on you.
Arsenal are more relevant than Liverpool these days, yet their last eight years are summed up in one word: stagnation. if a club that has stagnated is more relevant than Liverpool, what does that make Liverpool?
HIAG, if you actually read the replies to the thread you mention above, you'll see that the vast majority if us realise we have very little, if no chance of fourth.
But of course that doesn't suit your WUM agenda, does it?


It's also brought you long streaks of utter irrelevance, which seems lost on you.
Arsenal are more relevant than Liverpool these days, yet their last eight years are summed up in one word: stagnation. if a club that has stagnated is more relevant than Liverpool, what does that make Liverpool?
I had to chuckle when I read this, on the BBC Football web page:-
Daniel, Liverpool, via text: "Here's a cheeky little fact for you. Raheem Sterling wasn't even born the last time Newcastle beat Liverpool at Anfield. How old does that make you feel, Phil?"
After today, it could well be a "cheeky little fact" that Raheem Sterling will have played his part in 'Pool's first loss to the Toon at Klanfield, since he was born.
That'll be one for him to stick in his scrapbook![]()
What a crock that comment is, last league title 1989, trophy wins in 92, 95, 01, 03, 05, 06, 12(2 6yr gaps).
Of those won includes a treble of cups in one season and the Champions League and a further appearance in another CL final.
Our finishing League positions by season since the start of the prem 6,8,4,3,4,3,7,4,3,2,5,4,5,3,3,4,2,7,6,8
As opposed to Spurs 8,15,7,8,10,14,11,10,14,9,5,5,11,8,4,5,4
Last 3 seasons we've been ****e end of.

What a crock that comment is, last league title 1989, trophy wins in 92, 95, 01, 03, 05, 06, 12(2 6yr gaps).
Of those won includes a treble of cups in one season and the Champions League and a further appearance in another CL final.
Our finishing League positions by season since the start of the prem 6,8,4,3,4,3,7,4,3,2,5,4,5,3,3,4,2,7,6,8
As opposed to Spurs 8,15,7,8,10,14,11,10,14,9,5,5,11,8,4,5,4
Last 3 seasons we've been ****e end of.

Sorry, but that is not how I (or the vast majority of normal fans) read that thread.
Yes, there is a nod towards the usual "oh, but, of course, we might not get 4th" bull5hit, but the underlying tone of all comments is that you can still get 4th. It's encapsulated in the very title of that thread ("Only whisper it..."). The reason why you have been implored by the OP to "only whisper it" is because you know only too well that you will have the piss ripped out of you by every single normal fan who knows that you don't stand a chance of finishing in the top 7, let alone the top 4. Indeed, you ought to be counting yourselves lucky if you can finish in the top half of the table, this season.
The idea of a top 4 finish is utterly laughable, whether you "whisper" it or not.
There is no wumming, here; only good honest, objective and unbiased comment.
Part of your delusion expresses itself in the view that any opinion that is contrary to your own must be nothing more than wumming. Until such time as you Mousers are able to honestly declare that 'Pool is now a spent force in English (let alone European) football, I fear that there is little hope of you being released from your delusions. Until the day when I hear Robbie "draw me a line of coke" Fowler tell an interviewer "Liverpool deserves to be mid-table because we are now a mid-table club," I hold out little hope that your delusion will dissipate in the short term. Indeed, I suspect that it is going to take 5 or 6 more seasons of mid-table obscurity, and perhaps even a relegation out of the top-flight, to shake you of your delusion and arrogance (as it did with the Toon fans).

last league title 1989
More like that's the only part of the response you didn't ignore as it fits your viewpoint.last league title 1989
That is the only part of your response that is relevant. Titles won since 1989: 0
That is the only part of your response that is relevant. Titles won since 1989: 0

btw during the last 8 yrs Arsenal have been more 'relevant' in league terms but we have been more relevant in the Champions league. :0)
Funny, in the last three years we've been far more relevant than your lot.
The mantra I keep reading (other than "wah wah, editing to suit your viewpoint" at constant intervals) is variations on "we've had three bad seasons", which shows a certain arrogance - it implies you believe that it had nothing to do with an increasing number of teams having better seasons than Liverpool.
There's a difference between season the minimal expectations are met and a bad season. For example, we endured a lot of drudgery during the tail end of the Sugar era, but only one or two of them were "bad" seasons - one because of a catastrophic injury list, and one because of an inept managerial appointment based on the foolish belief that Arsene Wenger was just some bloke from the J-League so hiring some bloke from Switzerland might work just as well.
The minimal expectations for a Liverpool season is a Top 4 finish, and that hasn't been met three times in a row. Yet the only time that can be blamed on a "bad" season is when Benitez guided you to seventh, because the expectation was to continue a run of Top 4 finishes and instead they fell way short of that. Last season, in comparison, wasn't a bad season. Man City, Man Utd, Arsenal, Spurs and Newcastle all had better seasons - it was a bad season for Chelsea, but they turned it around (much to the chagrin of every other football fan in Europe)
A lot of Liverpool's prominence these days has nothing to do with what happens on the pitch, but a lot to do with the sheer number of Liverpool Old Boys with jobs as commentators, pundits and columnists across the media, so whenever anything good or bad (because indifferent doesn't exist in the world of the Premier League) happens, it gets magnified as they all tend to have an opinion of it. The number of Arsenal Old Boys starting to get into the same sphere has seen a similar thing start to happen with Arsenal.
The minimal expectations for a Liverpool season is a Top 4 finish, and that hasn't been met three times in a row.
I see that 'Pool managed to sneak a draw. They did far better than I thought they would, to be honest.
I note that Roy Rodgers is praising his players, despite the fact that Suarez (apart from his goal) couldn't hit a barn door at 5 paces. They are now a mere 2 points off 17th place, just above the drop-zone.
No doubt, the Mousers will tell us that 4th is still on for them, and that Rodgers remains their best manager since Bob Paisley.
Funny, in the last three years we've been far more relevant than your lot.
The mantra I keep reading (other than "wah wah, editing to suit your viewpoint" at constant intervals) is variations on "we've had three bad seasons", which shows a certain arrogance - it implies you believe that it had nothing to do with an increasing number of teams having better seasons than Liverpool.
There's a difference between season the minimal expectations are met and a bad season. For example, we endured a lot of drudgery during the tail end of the Sugar era, but only one or two of them were "bad" seasons - one because of a catastrophic injury list, and one because of an inept managerial appointment based on the foolish belief that Arsene Wenger was just some bloke from the J-League so hiring some bloke from Switzerland might work just as well.
The minimal expectations for a Liverpool season is a Top 4 finish, and that hasn't been met three times in a row. Yet the only time that can be blamed on a "bad" season is when Benitez guided you to seventh, because the expectation was to continue a run of Top 4 finishes and instead they fell way short of that. Last season, in comparison, wasn't a bad season. Man City, Man Utd, Arsenal, Spurs and Newcastle all had better seasons - it was a bad season for Chelsea, but they turned it around (much to the chagrin of every other football fan in Europe)
A lot of Liverpool's prominence these days has nothing to do with what happens on the pitch, but a lot to do with the sheer number of Liverpool Old Boys with jobs as commentators, pundits and columnists across the media, so whenever anything good or bad (because indifferent doesn't exist in the world of the Premier League) happens, it gets magnified as they all tend to have an opinion of it. The number of Arsenal Old Boys starting to get into the same sphere has seen a similar thing start to happen with Arsenal.

I see you managed to give excuses as to why Spurs were crap for so long(Sugar etc)but you airbrushed our problems over the last 3 seasons out, 4 managers, club almost going bankrupt, influential players leaving etc, but whichever way you dress it up your club is trying to emulate the success that our club has enjoyed and flattering as that may be you lads on here should embrace it instead of abuse it.![]()