we have many legends, you only have windyass and the ****ing humber bridge, thats a legend for everyone to get the **** away from hull. but anyway the point of the thread is, qpr may be playing hull again in the championship,
Where's the choice, "I dont give a **** about football" Because that's what I think about this crap in a global thread.
Can we give Hull a points deduction just for being Hull and also for once being managed by a bottle of tango
can we not send them to the conference, just for being hull and being a horrible **** team and place, qpr can stay if it's at the expense of hull
KingoStarr, I would normally be more eloquent with others who have a modicum of intelligence, but with you I think a more direct route is justified, so, why don't you **** off, you inbred piece of black and white scum? A chocolate fire-guard is of more use than you, or, that ****-awful team you support! This is said with due respect to fans of your team who have been bred without their sister/brother/cousin/grand-parents not having been involved in the act of ****ing, unlike your good self! Also with the respect that you are now in the League you deserve to be in, due to their performance on the pitch!!!
I can't see all this bad feeling towards Hull fans....It's not there fault they were born in the God damn ****tiest place on the planet...
From what I've read so far many of us on here are being drawn into other peoples opinions/views. If these accusations are to be believed, QPR should be fined. It's understandable that the two clubs are or were in two different situations. But, the FA deducting points from QPR can ruin the entire season which each individual in their squad has worked extremely hard for in order for their team to be promoted to the Premier League.
Who cares? By the looks of things the 3 teams coming up are the weakest teams to come up in a while..They'll all struggle anyway, especially Norwich, 2 consecutive promotions? They're going to hit a big hefty brick wall if they go up. QPR will struggle, but not as much. Oh and you can keep Routledge XD Can't even remember how to spell his bloody name..
Well, considering I was not born in the ****tiest, or have lived in the ****tiest place on the planet, I could not quote on what it is like being from Scumderland!!! But by the comments from ****s like you, I am glad that my travels have allowed me to bypass your piece of **** you call home!!
If the FA don't take any action at all then the other clubs around the play off zone might seek legal advice as they will say thay they were cheated???
http://latestnewsanonymous.blogspot.com/2011/04/does-world-revolve-around-sun.html Does the World Revolve around The Sun? In the build up to the FA hearing it was always likely that sensationalist stories would appear in many of the tabloids. In recent days both the Sun and the Daily Mail have published entirely conflicting information about what the outcome of the hearing will be, showing how little they actually know about the subject. The FA has not commented on the matter, and Queens Park Rangers have released a statement which makes it clear that they will not be commenting on The Suns article either. It is clear that the independent panel will not be influenced by completely unfounded rumours, especially one coming from such a lowly-regarded newspaper. It speaks volumes that no respected national newspaper has come out with such an unreliable and uninformed story. The article claims to have been based on a statement by an FA source, stating, "There's no question QPR have broken the rules. They know it as well. The only debate is what to do about it. If they aren't found guilty you might as well scrap the rules about third-party owners." Queens Park Rangers have openly admitted to the fact that they broke the rules regarding the non-FA registered agent that was used for the transfer, and they WILL be found guilty for this offence, which will result in a small fine. The fact that this supposedly credible FA source has stated that Queens Park Rangers will be “hit hard” for breaching the third-party ownership rules will cause many people to wonder whether Shaun Custis simply overheard a discussion between the Norwich City and Cardiff City supporting toilet attendants in the “corridors of power.” The article would be more suited to a club message board ‘Rumours’ section than the back-page of a national newspaper, but this has probably helped The Sun sell a few more papers, saved Shaun Custis from the task of doing any real journalism, and allowed him to spend the day backtracking on twitter. Just THREE hours after declaring a remarkable 15 point deduction Mr. Custis announced to the world, “Don't know if they will be docked points but possible.” Remarkable. The fact that many people are choosing to ignore about this case is that Alejandro Faurlin has never been an ineligible player for Queens Park Rangers, so any sort of points deduction would be unwarranted. Once the Football League Rules were changed to forbid any sort of third-party involvement he was given a new contract in accordance with advice received from the FA, after the club drew their attention to it. A simple clerical error in the forms was highlighted and the high-class Withers law firm will prove that no deliberate (and more importantly, no performance enhancing) wrongdoing occurred. A fine it will be, and Queens Park Rangers fans will be able to celebrate a long-awaited return to the Premier League tomorrow if their team is able to gain a point against Watford. Posted by AnonymousInformant at 16:07
