Alistair Johnston Statement

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
rogueleader said:
the proposition was someone gets arrested for drug possesion in their home and if they then say " everyone in the street also is in possession of drugs " the police will proceed to investigate everyone in the street. The chances of this occurring are exactly zero.
Click to expand...

I'm not basing any of this on what tarquin said.

I'm basing this on the clearly warped and ******ed views of an ex copper (no ****ing wonder he got sacked)

http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/9945032.Big_cannabis_farm_found_after_tip_off/

POLICE have uncovered a cannabis farm described as “substantial and well organised” – the second to be discovered in the same street this year.

Officers attended a property in Greenbank Road, Darlington, on Saturday morning after a tip-off from a member of the public who had noticed suspicious activity at the site.
Click to expand...

I could quite literally do this all day.
 
DevAdvocate said:
So if the Police get a tip off from a drug dealer that EVERYONE in his street is growing weed would the police spend valuable time and resources investigating EVERYONE in the street or would they shrug it off as a complete waste of time?
Click to expand...

So what your saying is someone who is not guilty of any crime apart from being suspected as a drug dealer means that any accusation he/she makes shouldn't be investigated?

It's the polices job to investigate, no matter how ****ing frivolous it may seem, its what they are paid for.
 
DevAdvocate said:
Do you think a Sherrif would grant a search warrant for a whole street on the say so of an accused criminal?
Click to expand...

MD 20/20 said:
Do you think the police would ask for a search warrant without doing any investigating?

How did you manage to go from accusation to search warrant?
Click to expand...

DevAdvocate said:
How do the Police investigate people growing weed in their houses without obtaining a Warrant? Stick their noses through the letterboxes of 100 houses?
Click to expand...

MD 20/20 said:
No they investigate claims by members of the public of strange activity or investigate based on the concerns of electric companies.

If that fails they always have the heat cameras on helicopters.

You're so full of ****e its beyond a joke.
Click to expand...

MD 20/20 said:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-19649247

6 Days ago.



I'll take an apology from you now.
Click to expand...

MD 20/20 said:
I'm not basing any of this on what tarquin said.

I'm basing this on the clearly warped and ******ed views of an ex copper (no ****ing wonder he got sacked)

http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/9945032.Big_cannabis_farm_found_after_tip_off/



I could quite literally do this all day.
Click to expand...

DevAdvocate said:
<laugh>

What a ****ing spanner.
Click to expand...

My work here is done.

<cracker><magic>
 
MD 20/20 said:
So what your saying is someone who is not guilty of any crime apart from being suspected as a drug dealer means that any accusation he/she makes shouldn't be investigated?

It's the polices job to investigate, no matter how ****ing frivolous it may seem, its what they are paid for.
Click to expand...
This is how it works
RebelBhoy said:
People are of course invited to come forward with information. To institute an investigation based on that information it needs to be given a value. Some crackpot saying something is not a reason to start an investigation.
Click to expand...
 
rogueleader said:
its what everyone else has been discussing.
Click to expand...

Well maybe you should read what has been said already before assuming what I'm talking about and going off in a wee rant <ok>

MD 20/20 said:
No this is past the point of celtic I'm having fun ripping your ****e comparison with the police forces search tactics.

Not exactly something I didn't know but you are the first (albeit ex) copper to actually admit searching people when you have no suspicion happens and it is perfectly fine and reasonable.

I'm fairly sure most of the coppers just like the look of my dick thanks for confirming that.
Click to expand...

It's not much to ask is it?
 
MD 20/20 said:
So what your saying is someone who is not guilty of any crime apart from being suspected as a drug dealer means that any accusation he/she makes shouldn't be investigated?

It's the polices job to investigate, no matter how ****ing frivolous it may seem, its what they are paid for.
Click to expand...

I assumed you were at it for laughs but I'll tell you for what it's worth , you know **** all about how the Police work, you don't have a clue but the fact that you don't know it speaks volumes <ok>
 
DevAdvocate said:
I assumed you were at it for laughs but I'll tell you for what it's worth , you know **** all about how the Police work, you don't have a clue but the fact that you don't know it speaks volumes <ok>
Click to expand...

You're right, I don't know what goes through an officers mind when he decides that a random person warrants a strip search just because he says so.

However I imagine its a long the lines of "I bet his cock would look good in me"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back