I think either two things have happened. One the club have tried buying goalkeepers but the deals have fallen through so therefore have had to stick with Kelvin Davis. Or the club firmly believed davis would cut it at the premier league and believed that we needed strengthning in other areas by buying ramirez for 11million; if this was the case then i disagree with the club!
Surely we needed to strengthen the team with a goalkeeper, another centre back and left back. Its great to have Ramirez but do you think the money should have been spent more wisely?
Yes in one word . Poor transfer window and I think buying Ramirez is a cynical ploy as if we balls up we will sell him for the same amount , good business but it hardly strengthens our defence .
