No they won't. If titles are stripped, it will be because of dual contracts, which is in breach of association rules.
Paying players outwith their contracts so they have more money to use is financial doping to me. It wasn't an administrative error it was done to gain a financial advantage.
Yes. Dual contracts that remunerated players with contractual payments outwith those detailed in contracts lodged with the SFA......so financial doping.
We can debate what is and isn't financial doping and in the meantime FIFA/EUFA will occasionally make noises about it as I don't believe there are regulations and/or rules anywhere in any football association regarding that particular topic which can result in the stripping of titles. In our case, if titles are stripped, it will be because of breaking association rules as regards dual contracts. A pendantic point, I know, but I'm in a pendatic mood this morning while I procrastinate over the large amount of work I need to get done today.
No matter what happens to rangers, be it fines or bans or titles stripped, the SFA should investagate each team into there financial history, and if teams have the same breaches, the should get the same punishment.
No-one is disagreeing with you on that. You seem convinced other teams have fielded ineligible players, though.
I've wasted more time on you imbeciles than my previous quota stated. In summation, go **** yourself you tattie eating backwards thinking gypo ****.
I disagree with that. To institute an investigation you need to have grounds to do so. You suggested that Celtic should be investigated and I asked you what for. You have failed to offer a response to this. I am going to put it down to completely unfounded whataboutery. If you want to say that procedures should be tightened up then I would agree with you. Rangers going to the wall has shown that their procedures need to be revised.
