Given the choice of getting rid of and keeping one, I'd rather keep Walcott. Weird choice some might say, but Van Persie has had 1 decent season in the last 8: is permanently injutes or suspended, and you will get aleast £20M for him, and hes a twat. Walcott is good, better if hes played in the middle, and will get about 5 more years out of him.