Summer Transfer Rumour Thread.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
He will be claiming that the players are part of the assets that he purchased. Also read somewhere that he said the contracts which agreed cut price release fees stated they would transfer over to the newco.
 
benditlikeabanana said:
then why cant de ridder do that ? or Walcott come to that. It is probably 80% of thier job, they should have had enough practice to put in a decent delivery
Click to expand...

Either because they don't look up, don't have any runners to find or aren't in a position to cross. It's not their job to defend or tippy tappy around in midfield and its us asking them to do that which compromise their abiility to run at defenders.
 
benditlikeabanana said:
surely if you have a contract with a company that goes tits up, the old contract is null and void
Click to expand...

it may not be as simple as that. I am not 100%, but TUPE is applied to protect the employees when a company is brought from administration. I am not sure how much it protects the new employer though.
 
PFA have already said the players are within their rights to move. Scot FA will investigate and then if they don't act to process registrations the courts or FIFA will force them. No problem.
 
fatletiss said:
it may not be as simple as that. I am not 100%, but TUPE is applied to protect the employees when a company is brought from administration. I am not sure how much it protects the new employerthough.
Click to expand...

SFA are ready to give the players temporary clearance, then decide what to do. Surely if they didn't think it was right they would block it all together?.
 
fatletiss said:
it may not be as simple as that. I am not 100%, but TUPE is applied to protect the employees when a company is brought from administration. I am not sure how much it protects the new employer though.
Click to expand...


From my understanding of Company law Tupe is applied to protect the current work force to ensure they are allowed to stay in the same job with the new administration how ever employees would have to sign a new contract. If they refuse then they are effectively resigning. Personnel cannot be sold as assets (Slavery laws) however if Rangers had been bought out as Rangers then it would have been deemed that their contracts had been bought out by the new owners. As this is a new company then under English law at least their old contracts would have been null and void. Note the word English law guys........
 
Beddytare said:
From my understanding of Company law Tupe is applied to protect the current work force to ensure they are allowed to stay in the same job with the new administration how ever employees would have to sign a new contract. If they refuse then they are effectively resigning. Personnel cannot be sold as assets (Slavery laws) however if Rangers had been bought out as Rangers then it would have been deemed that their contracts had been bought out by the new owners. As this is a new company then under English law at least their old contracts would have been null and void. Note the word English law guys........
Click to expand...

Thanks Beddy, I was unsure of the effect on the employee if he decided not to stay.
 
Looks like the Butland rooming with Cork idea hasn't worked out...yet. According to his Twitter he was rooming with Tom Cleverley.....













................























Make of that what you will.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back