Good read, shame its on Roker Report.........................exploited message boards with self publicity(good article here lads or words to that effect followed by a link to their page).
Well hits equal marketing revenue, look at their site now, sponsored links galore, feel exploited?
Felt the need to sign up and address this.
I don't really know where you're coming from - we at Roker Report have sometimes spread our work on messageboards, but we've also always said that it was ourselves who wrote the articles.
Also your point about 'sponsored links galore' is way off the mark. We get a tiny amount of money to keep the site ticking over, we don't line our pockets whatsoever. That's why we've actually been appealing for sponsorship on our podcast - we need help with bandwith costs and faulty equipment (the podcast was cancelled this week due to faulty equipment when recording).
We aren't exploiting people; we're Sunderland fans who put a hell of a lot of our spare time into providing fellow fans with what we like to think is interesting content.
Please, if you're going to slag us off, at least do it for something valid.
...From what I have observed; Roker Report is compiled by genuine supporters, who although I certainly don't always share their views, I have never doubted their motives...Felt the need to sign up and address this.
I don't really know where you're coming from - we at Roker Report have sometimes spread our work on messageboards, but we've also always said that it was ourselves who wrote the articles.
Also your point about 'sponsored links galore' is way off the mark. We get a tiny amount of money to keep the site ticking over, we don't line our pockets whatsoever. That's why we've actually been appealing for sponsorship on our podcast - we need help with bandwith costs and faulty equipment (the podcast was cancelled this week due to faulty equipment when recording).
We aren't exploiting people; we're Sunderland fans who put a hell of a lot of our spare time into providing fellow fans with what we like to think is interesting content.
Please, if you're going to slag us off, at least do it for something valid.
Thanks for the interview... I wasn't pleased when Bruce sold Anton. Anton was a great pro... It would have been very interesting to see him playing under the guidance Martin O'Neill.
Felt the need to sign up and address this.
I don't really know where you're coming from - we at Roker Report have sometimes spread our work on messageboards, but we've also always said that it was ourselves who wrote the articles.
Also your point about 'sponsored links galore' is way off the mark. We get a tiny amount of money to keep the site ticking over, we don't line our pockets whatsoever. That's why we've actually been appealing for sponsorship on our podcast - we need help with bandwith costs and faulty equipment (the podcast was cancelled this week due to faulty equipment when recording).
We aren't exploiting people; we're Sunderland fans who put a hell of a lot of our spare time into providing fellow fans with what we like to think is interesting content.
Please, if you're going to slag us off, at least do it for something valid.
Felt the need to sign up and address this.
I don't really know where you're coming from - we at Roker Report have sometimes spread our work on messageboards, but we've also always said that it was ourselves who wrote the articles.
Also your point about 'sponsored links galore' is way off the mark. We get a tiny amount of money to keep the site ticking over, we don't line our pockets whatsoever. That's why we've actually been appealing for sponsorship on our podcast - we need help with bandwith costs and faulty equipment (the podcast was cancelled this week due to faulty equipment when recording).
We aren't exploiting people; we're Sunderland fans who put a hell of a lot of our spare time into providing fellow fans with what we like to think is interesting content.
Please, if you're going to slag us off, at least do it for something valid.
Right let's get this correct...
Chris you have obviously been reading this board, and the one post has compelled you to open an account to address the matter....am i correct?
The rights and wrongs of the post i'm not interested in, how-ever what i am interested in is, now that you are a member will you still be around?
Be canny if you were and maybe do some threads and posts and give us the heads up on any stories..
Cheers.
"Quite a bit of traffic came from this forum had a little look and saw the above comment." - I rest my case.
How many other fanzines mercilessly self publicised like Roker Report - you were all over this board like a rash when you were just starting out, I said at the time you should be good enough to stand or fall without posting the "good read here" with a link to your site.
The jet2 link must be a nice little earner?
I wonder what Mick thinks about unpaid for links to third party websites?
How about a contribution from Roker Report to Not606?
