Specifically I think if you look for leadership Quinn and that is often what decides these things Quinn outshines others by miles (Not that its a competition)...It could be argued that foregoing his testimonial cash started a trend and it was to an extent ground breaking Not only that but there is a feeling that his internationalism is a strong facet
Foregoing cash to charity from one match isn't a groundbreaking trend. Thousands of people literally donate millions of pounds to charity, millions they have earned, and I can't really see why WHERE it's donated from should make such a difference? Whether you've earned it from one testimonial game, or earned it over months of footballing wages, if you donate a million quid to charity, then you donate a million quid to charity.
Many other powerful executives have achieved this. But Quinn leads in a way that appeals to practically everyone (apart from some it seems like yourself) Any man that naturally chooses to couple Delhi and Sunderland in the way he did deserves consideration Why? Because deep down you and I know he didnt do it for profit...we truly know...dont we?
Yeah it's appealing, even to me, but there's a big difference between him having a respected approach and being given a knighthood by Britain.
And I don't know why he did it. Probably a mixture of things. It was for the good of the club, he wants the best for the club, and it was his job at the time.
But to be fair though, Quinn was the Director of International Development, so should he really be given a KNIGHTHOOD for basically doing his job as he was supposed to do anyway? How many medals would we dish out if that was a factor?
I think Syds dilema is well founded because you sound too comfortable Youre obviously not offensive tho as youve apologised and that is to your credit...Its great youre here... What would you have given for a Quinny not as an asset just to be associated with "The man"...be honest? Pointless to compare with Bobby Robson as it would be to compare with Bruce Forsyth who has waited centuries for his honour and further the ex boss of RSB !!!!
I would have loved someone like Quinn at our club, of course. I respect the bloke, I think his honour should be upgraded, but I just don't think he deserves a knighthood. He's only 45, and he simply hasn't done enough (yet).
And it's well worth comparing him to someone like Sir Bobby, because it highlights what SHOULD really be required for a knighthood. Over 50 years in the business, influencing English football down to its very core, inspiring so many players across Europe and becoming one of the most iconic and respected men in the world of football. In my view, he only
just deserves a knighthood, so why would I personally put Quinn on the same level? He's done a lot and he has been honoured for it already, but not enough for a knighthood.
As for Fred Goodwin, it's worth looking at the facts. At the time he was awarded his knighthood, he had managed RBS, a quite small British bank, and turned it into the WORLD'S largest company at almost £2trillion in asset value, and the 5th largest bank in the world by stock market value. Whilst no one could have known the future, at the time of his knighthood, his contributions to British banking were frankly incredible. That's why he got a knighthood at the time, and that's why it was rightly annulled when he cocked everything up later on.