Election 2024

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

How are Labour doing after their first 12 months


  • Total voters
    23
The Tories have flopped mate, I’m not defending them here but there’s no way you could consider them doing worse than Labour. In most areas where it was between them and Labour battling for the councillors, the Tories wiped the floor with them for the seats that were available.
This is fair enough

Yet she’s got the best approval rating of all the current leaders.

You must log in or register to see images

More In Common tbf is traditionally the Conservative leaning pollster, they always overestimate the Tory vote
 
I honestly think Burnham could cause a Carney style turnaround but Starmer will not give up on his own.
He needs to be removed

But they're constantly banging on about Angela ****ing Rayner taking the job, she's pointless.
 
Labour MP biting the bullet saying she'll start the process to run against Starmer - she doesn't want to be PM and knows she personally can't win but hopes it will convince an actual challenger to be brave enough to come forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego and brb
I honestly think Burnham could cause a Carney style turnaround but Starmer will not give up on his own.
He needs to be removed

But they're constantly banging on about Angela ****ing Rayner taking the job, she's pointless.

Andy Burnham is a genuine, bone fide, man of the people type, and clearly authentic, labour politician. Scouser as mayor of Manchester. If he was not the real thing, he'd have been gone ages ago.

Kier Starmer is a ****ing spiv with slicked back hair that is a million miles away from being a labour politician.
Sir Kier? Yeah, very labour, right?

Burnham is most likely labours only real hope, they need to get past whatever it is that means they 'can't' have him as a candidate.

Raynor is a dog. Wasn't she sacked anyway, why would they even be able to bring her back?
 
Last edited:
Andy Burnham is a genuine, bone fide, man of the people type, and clearly authentic, labour politician. Scouser as mayor of Manchester. If he was not the real thing, he'd have been gone ages ago.

Kier Starmer is a ****ing spiv with slicked back hair that is a million miles away from being a labour politician Sir Kier? Yeah, very labour, right?

Burnham is most likely labours only real hope, they need to get past whatever it is that means they 'can't' have him as a candidate.

Raynor is a dog. Wasn't she sacked anyway, why would they even be able to bring her back?
She resigned - so much like Mandelson resigned twice under Blair, and was eventually sacked third time round.
 
Andy Burnham is a genuine, bone fide, man of the people type, and clearly authentic, labour politician. Scouser as mayor of Manchester. If he was not the real thing, he'd have been gone ages ago.

Kier Starmer is a ****ing spiv with slicked back hair that is a million miles away from being a labour politician Sir Kier? Yeah, very labour, right?

Burnham is most likely labours only real hope, they need to get past whatever it is that means they 'can't' have him as a candidate.

Raynor is a dog. Wasn't she sacked anyway, why would they even be able to bring her back?
If i understand it right, they can`t make him PM because he isn`t an actual MP he is a councillor.
 
She resigned - so much like Mandelson resigned twice under Blair, and was eventually sacked third time round.

Because she had he fingers in the till, so to speak?

So not really Prime Minster candidate tbh.

But this is 2026 Britain, so **** knows.
 
If i understand it right, they can`t make him PM because he isn`t an actual MP he is a councillor.
They came up with some absolute waffle as to why he couldn’t stand in the by-election that dozy Green bint and the mujahideen won but eventually he’d get a chance. Wouldn’t mean he’d win unless it was a ridiculously safe seat and they’d need that safe seat to be up for grabs in the first place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
If i understand it right, they can`t make him PM because he isn`t an actual MP he is a councillor.
Trouble is NEC blocked him, wonder if they will have a rethink now. Need someone in a safe seat to resign now and create an opening for him. Unless there is another way?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
If i understand it right, they can`t make him PM because he isn`t an actual MP he is a councillor.

You'd think they'd have a word and get him to relinquish whatever it is that's stopping him.

Always assuming labour actually want him on board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
Not sure his potential mayoral candidate
successor losing Manchester was "waffle"
(quite prescient given recent days) .

I can't emphasis enough that the reason Labour are consistently losing is because the current PM is extremely unpopular and has absolutely no skills with the public.

He is the PM because of FPTP and that is it, their 33% vote share was simply appalling.

A charismatic leader would sweep this next election, there are lots of British parties yes, but none of them are popular - someone who can connect with voters will easily maintain a majority.
 
I don't actually think Starmer has done a lot wrong. I mean he didn't handle the Mandleson issue brilliantly, but the actual substance stuff, he's been okay at, without being that dynamic. He's been better on the international stage, proving to be quite a decent statesman

When you look at the utter **** show under Cameron, May, Boris et al. Who spent 14 years ****ing things up, he's actually a breath of fresh air

But this is politics, where leaders are decided by popularity contest and public opinion is set by tik tok influencers, and Starmer is now looking like a sitting duck and Labour are only heading in one direction if they stick with him for much longer.
 
I don't actually think Starmer has done a lot wrong. I mean he didn't handle the Mandleson issue brilliantly, but the actual substance stuff, he's been okay at, without being that dynamic. He's been better on the international stage, proving to be quite a decent statesman

When you look at the utter **** show under Cameron, May, Boris et al. Who spent 14 years ****ing things up, he's actually a breath of fresh air

But this is politics, where leaders are decided by popularity contest and public opinion is set by tik tok influencers, and Starmer is now looking like a sitting duck and Labour are only heading in one direction if they stick with him for much longer.

If it was 2010 he'd be doing fine.

Cameron btw needs a special mention as I truly believe he's one of the worst Prime Ministers Britain has ever had. His handling of the financial crisis was poor, his decision to have a Scottish referendum was poor (indyref was polling at 30% approval before Cameron got involved), his handling of the Brexit referendum was genuinely terrible - first having an IN/Out referendum with very little substantial debate, announcing what side he was on and then immediately resigning when he lost. **** politician, **** leader.

He was also just a poor Tory leader - lest we forget that he actually could have lost to Ed Miliband.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE