he says he really doesnt want to re-open the debate, yet he makes a 455 word post saying just how correct he was more than once
Seems to be plenty missing the point, it wasn't what Acun said but what a number of posters interpreted it all to mean and then posted all the doom and gloom most of which has turned out to be incorrect. See GFAW earlier post for examples.
Where was the fraud allegation? He obviously had liquidity issues as he's alluded to himself but I don't recall there being an allegation of fraud,
What turned out to be incorrect? Are you now saying he wasn't struggling to provide liquidity? If he wasn't then why where the changes he alluded to necessary?
I would have given you the whole long list (yet again) ... but it seems like some don't like me pointing out that I was right all along, so I'll resist
On the adding value thing, as the ground is intrinsically linked to the football club - which he does own - any improvements to, or surrounding, the ground, does add value to the club, despite not having direct ownership of the ground. What he's essentially doing is adding value to our lease agreement.
Totally agree. I hate seeing templated kits, it’s ****ing disgusting the amount of money they charge and make. I always loved our Umbro designs, but think they’ve gone downhill these days too, and connected to Castore now. What about Hummel?
I remember a huge sinkhole opening up in Tokyo a few years back. 36 hours later you couldn’t see a single ****ing scratch.
I had a look at the proposals errea had done for City when I took Les Motherby and another City fan for a look around the errea HQ in Parma. They were class, something totally different but bound to be a big hit if ever used. As it stands errea are in the running but not the box seat.
The EFL were refusing to let us sign players for free until we offloaded players. I'm pleased that much of the doom-mongering appears to have been bullshit, but all was not totally fine.
