Right Honourable Angela Rayner
- Thread starter 123Daveyboy
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
WHAT YOU CLASS AS FASCISM IS ORDINARY PEOPLE PROTESTING AGAINST INJUSTICE, rent a mob Antifa are fascists and are bussed in by POLICE UNDER ORDERS yes those are fascists with their faces masked up armed looking for trouble the answer is no I'm not in favour of Antifa
Do you support fascism? Yes or no? I answered no to your question.
Here goes this might help …
Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology defined by a dictatorial leader, the forced suppression of opposition, and the regimentation of society and the economy, fascist movements prioritize the nation or a specific race above the individual
Do you support this - yes or no ?
Why do you never answer a straight question, always using whataboutery and look over their , Back on topic Rayner stole her sons inheritance to have a love nest on the coast, if it was for her son, why are there pictures without her son canoodling with her Stud instead of taking the boy out a much better way which nobody would have minded but 3 houses one which was free and taxpayer funded, glad the truth came out, and she admitted to it, and pull the wool over didn't work
A straight question. Do I support Hamas? No.
Do you support fascism? Definition supplied. Yes or no?
No i don't support Antifa fascism as that's the only type i have seen masked up armed thugs at rallies intimidating Joe public would you like me to post proof videos , no matter how many Starmer takes down there is one where a policeman asked them to hand their swords in before the armed police arrive
Again Whataboutery by you dodging the topic of Rayner and her dishonesty which even you can't condone
I don’t support Antifa. I don’t condone what she did. I don’t condone tax dodging of any kind but it’s a shame. Down to you now.
Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology defined by a dictatorial leader, the forced suppression of opposition, and the regimentation of society and the economy, fascist movements prioritize the nation or a specific race above the individual
Do you support this - yes or no ?
Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology defined by a dictatorial leader, the forced suppression of opposition, and the regimentation of society and the economy, fascist movements prioritize the nation or a specific race above the individual
Do you support this - yes or no ?
my you have got the bug you are talking bollocks, that's why Kier is known as 2kier if he did his job properly without favouritism there would be no such thing
Fascism is a far left affiliation, stop going off subject you know you are trying to make Rayner look like Mother Terasa
Last edited:
THEY ARE THAT SCARED OF BEING PHOTOGRAPHED DOING VIOLENCE, THEY TRY AND FORCE JOURNALIST AWAY and all the mass-produced signs are paid for by lefty backers
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/QL2Tdovkxec?feature=share
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/QL2Tdovkxec?feature=share
Facists are basically anyone that lefties don't agree with.
The nasty names don't work anymore, people are happy to express their own opinion these days.
Britain's new Foreign Secretary Tommy Cooper arrives at Downing Street | AFP
You must log in or register to see media
You've twice replied to a question I asked someone else if this was their point.
However it does seem that anyone that questions anything about labour is hit with the reply that the tories and reform are even worse.
That's some defence.the Tories are horrendous and reform are even worse, this However does not make Labour good.
People on here who have pointed out flaws in the Labour Party have been shot down and been called right wing extremists and want Farage in power, even though they have never actually revealed who they would support in a general election.
Corruption is rife in politics simple fact.
No, not at all. She was deputy PM they are business men. Does this make what they are doing right, no.
However someone in the position she is in is always going to be scrutinised 100% more.
I'm sure there are plenty Labour party donors that have dodged tax in some way or another. All tax dodgers should be held accountable, but this is impossible.
Yet again your only argument is Reform are worse.
I'm sure they are, but I would never vote Reform anyway, so that argument is never going to make me believe Labour are trustworthy
It’s the same wherever you go though. Here in Australia the prevailing method is to rubbish the other party.
The last general election there were a series of live debates between the two main party leaders , Albanese for Labor and Peter Dutton for the Liberals. Initially it was all “if you re-elect/elect us then we will do….” They eventually degenerated into “vote for us because the others are crap”.
I said it on the other Starmer/reeves thread as well. Politicians can’t be trusted. As James Herbert said “ghosts these days are a shoddy lot.” You can easily say the same about most politicians.
My honest view is that the jury is out on Labour. They’re doing a a better job of many things like creating better services with a way to go. The stuff I want most - easing the cost of living for everyday people they have disappointed me. I’m not a fan of some decisions and I think the donor issue is what’s made Labour shy away from wealth taxes. As you say big donors are often tax avoiders in all parties and it’s a massive problem for our democracy at all levels. Im not particularly defending Labour. Rayner has walked into this mess and I’m disappointed because she’s one of the few that I like in government because she’s more connected to normal life. There are a number of people on here backing Reform though and this is the ultimate in double standard. Reform are backed by significant wealth who have insisted that their policy helps the richest pay less tax. To criticise this minuscule amount without opening your mind to the reality that Reform are legitimising not paying your share if you have obscene wealth is a massive irony. I fully understand concerns about Labour I’m merely pointing out that we have other options that might actually help everyday people which Reform won’t. I urge Labour to do better because they remain the best hope we don’t get a fascist grifter