i would rather keep Endo than Gomez tbh as his injury record is shocking unfortunately as he is a really useful squad player when available .
Endo is a warm body though. As much as he has a role he’s taking up space and isn’t a player slot will rotate in midfield as he doesn’t have the ability on the ball that he wants.
Was it? Was it really? Or are you just guessing at all of the possible variables that led to this point? Give the club credit. We’ve kept two of the biggest names in the league
massive assumptions. Thats the only fact I’m afraid. You don’t have a scooby about the details, so are completely unqualified to make that assessment. As am I.
Nope. It's a massive risk to not sort these things out. We are very happy to sit here in first talking about contracts that got signed. In another year we could be sat here eating we had a few injuries and be fighting for 4th and hearing players are going as a different view of the future prospects emerged. Thats the risk. Hindsight is a wonderful thing isn't it? All looks nice and straightforward and always going to happen Risk is an uncertain future event. Of course there wa massive risk letting these contracts run down
I can tell you, categorically, that i would rather have the club manage risk, than you. In this instance, risk is a two way street. Understandably, as a fan, you don’t care about this but as a business, you have to look at everything. Given the end result, I think that the clubs tactics worked very, very well. I don’t expect you to agree because for as long as I’ve been on here, you’ve been anti Edwards, despite the very obvious success that he was instrumental in bringing us.
Hindsight. Plus Edwards has nothing to do with day to day. He is not employed by lfc. He works for fsg in a global role and might even eventually buy a new club. This is about Hughes being in the job since last March and taking the risk of losing both, just cos it worked out in thr end doesn't mean it wasn't a risk.
Youd have sold them all last summer if you were in charge. Because not one of those players was signing a new contract before a manager was appointed.
As I said at the time. I'd have sorted it then one-way or the other. If they were willing to sign then, they would have i suppose. If you say they would not then again there had to be a risk they would not have at all based on how things worked out. So I interpret what you have said there was there was a risk.
